-
expand
Ali and others v Christian Salvesen Food Services Ltd [1995] IRLR 624 EAT
(1 report relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 1 September 1995
In Ali and others v Christian Salvesen Food Services plc the EAT holds that a contract of employment, which provided that overtime payments would be made only when the employee had worked more than the annualised hours total of 1,824 hours in the working year, contained an implied term entitling the employee, whose employment terminated several months before the end of the working year, to overtime payments in certain circumstances.
-
expand
Ali and others v Christian Salvesen Food Services Ltd [1997] IRLR 17 CA
(1 report relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 15 December 1996
In Christian Salvesen Food Services Ltd v Ali and others, the Court of Appeal considers an "annualised hours" contract, deriving from a collective agreement, under which employees were paid a standard wage for a notional 40-hour week, but overtime became payable only after 1,824 hours had been worked in a 12-month period.
-
expand
Ali v Birmingham City Council EAT/0313/08
(1 report relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 12 December 2008
In Ali v Birmingham City Council EAT/0313/08, the EAT held that an employee's unambiguous resignation was effective and could not be unilaterally withdrawn once it had been accepted by the employer. It is only in exceptional circumstances that words of resignation should not be taken at their face value
-
expand
Ali v Capita Customer Management Ltd ET/1800990/2016
(1 report relating to this case)
-
expand
Ali v Office of National Statistics [2005] IRLR 201 CA
(1 report relating to this case)
-
expand
Allay (UK) Ltd v Gehlen EAT/0331/20
(1 report relating to this case)
-
expand
Allen and others v GMB [2008] IRLR 690 CA
(1 report relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 15 September 2008
In Allen and others v GMB [2008] IRLR 690, the Court of Appeal held that a trade union indirectly discriminated against a group of its members where its aim was to secure pay protection and future pay for employees, but its means of achieving this aim - persuading women with historic equal pay claims to settle them disadvantageously - were disproportionate.
-
expand
Allen and others v Morrison Facilities Services Ltd EAT/0298/13
(1 report relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 24 July 2014
In DLA Piper's latest case report, the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) held that employment tribunals have no jurisdiction to entertain freestanding claims by transferred employees against the transferee for its failure to provide the transferor with information about the measures that it envisages it will take in relation to the transferring employees.
-
expand
Allen v Cannon Hygiene Ltd [1994] EAT
(1 report relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 1 December 1994
Where an employee was told that a decision to transfer her was taken because she was a woman, the employers could not avoid a finding of sex discrimination by showing that the true reason for their decision was her unsatisfactory performance, rules the EAT in Allen v Cannon Hygiene Ltd.
-
expand
Allen v Hounga and other appeals EAT/0326/10
(1 report relating to this case)