-
expand
Bainbridge v Atlas Ward Structures Ltd ET/1800212/12
(1 report relating to this case)
-
expand
Bains v Amber Leisure Ltd [1994] IT/09972/94
(1 report relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 1 March 1995
It is a foreseeable consequence of discriminatory treatment that an employee will become upset and demotivated, holds a Birmingham industrial tribunal (Chair: A J McCarry) in Bains v Amber Leisure Ltd, finding that the dismissal of an ethnic minority employee for redundancy was unlawful discrimination even though he had requested it.
-
expand
Baker v Abellio London Ltd [2018] IRLR 186 EAT
(1 report relating to this case)
-
expand
Baker v Abellio London Ltd ET/2302684/2015
(1 report relating to this case)
-
expand
Baker v House of Commons Commission ET/2200145/2019
(1 report relating to this case)
-
expand
Baker v Securicor Omega Express Ltd [2000] IRLB 633 EAT
(1 report relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 31 December 2000
In Baker v Securicor Omega Express Ltd [2000] IRLB 633 EAT, the Employment Appeal Tribunal held that the employer had been in breach of contact in imposing a change from weekly to monthly pay, and the employee had been constructively dismissed. However, the dismissal was fair for some other substantial reason.
-
expand
Bakkali v Greater Manchester Buses (South) Ltd (t/a Stage Coach Manchester) [2018] IRLR 906 EAT
(1 report relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 17 May 2018
In Bakkali v Greater Manchester Buses (South) Ltd t/a Stage Coach Manchester, the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) held that asking a Muslim employee whether or not he supported IS did not amount to harassment because, given the context, the offending comment was not "related to" his religious belief or race.
-
expand
Bal v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (Jobcentre Plus) ET/1303255/08
(1 report relating to this case)
-
expand
Balamoody v United Kingdom Central Council for Nursing, Midwifery and Health Visiting [2002] IRLR 288 CA
(1 report relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 15 June 2002
In Balamoody v United Kingdom Central Council for Nursing, Midwifery and Health Visiting the Court of Appeal holds that an employment tribunal should have constructed a hypothetical comparator against which to consider whether there was evidence to support an inference that the complainant's treatment had been tainted with race discrimination. And the EAT holds in Williams v H M Prison Service that there is no additional duty on a tribunal to construct and consider the position of a hypothetical comparator.
-
expand
Balcombe v Dye and another t/a The Lane End Public House ET/2400765/2013
(1 report relating to this case)