-
expand
Barclays Bank plc v Kapur and others (No.2) [1995] IRLR 87 CA
(2 reports relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 1 December 1994
East African Asian employees of a UK bank who were required to waive their right to have their African service with a "group" employer credited for pension purposes, had not suffered race discrimination, holds the Court of Appeal in Barclays Bank plc v Kapur and others.
-
- Date:
- 1 December 1994
An industrial tribunal erred in finding that there had been direct racial discrimination in the absence of a finding that the reason for the treatment complained of was race-based, rules the Court of Appeal in Barclays Bank plc v Kapur and others (No.2).
-
expand
Barclays Bank plc v Various claimants [2020] IRLR 481 SC
(1 report relating to this case)
-
expand
Barke v Seetec Business Technology Centre Ltd [2005] IRLR 633 CA
(1 report relating to this case)
-
expand
Barlow v Horwich Farrelly Solicitors ET/415012/19
(1 report relating to this case)
-
expand
Barry v Midland Bank plc [1995] IT/52983/93
(1 report relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 1 September 1995
In Barry v Midland Bank plc a London South industrial tribunal (Chair: E R Donnelly) rules that a voluntary severance payment scheme, which failed to take account any full-time service a part-time worker may have had, was not unlawfully indirectly discriminatory because most women worked full-time rather than part-time.
-
expand
Barry v Midland Bank plc [1997] ICR 192 EAT
(1 report relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 1 May 1997
In Barry v Midland Bank plc, the EAT holds that a woman bank employee was not indirectly discriminated against on the ground of her sex when the bank calculated her severance pay by reference to her part-time salary at the time of termination, notwithstanding that she had been employed full time for the first 11 years of her 13 years' service.
-
expand
Barry v Midland Bank plc [1999] IRLR 581 HL
(1 report relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 15 September 1999
Calculating severance payments by reference to length of service and final pay, so that a part-time employee who had previously worked full time did not have her full-time service reflected in her severance payment, was not discriminatory, holds the House of Lords in Barry v Midland Bank plc.
-
expand
Bartholomew v London Borough of Hackney [1999] IRLR 246 CA
(1 report relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 15 July 1999
An employer did not act in breach of its common law duty of care in providing a reference for a former employee which stated that, when he had taken voluntary severance, he was suspended from work because of a charge of gross misconduct, but that disciplinary proceedings had lapsed automatically when his employment terminated, holds the Court of Appeal in Bartholomew v London Borough of Hackney.
-
expand
Bartholomews Agri Food Ltd v Thornton [2016] IRLR 432 HC
(1 report relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 1 June 2016
Beth Staniland is a trainee solicitor, and Emma Cousins, Ciara Jenkins, Iain Naylor and Lucy Sorell are associates at Addleshaw Goddard LLP. They round up the latest rulings.
-
expand
Barton v Investec Henderson Crosthwaite Securities Ltd [2003] IRLR 332 EAT
(1 report relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 3 July 2003
In Barton v Investec Henderson Crosthwaite Securities Ltd, the EAT holds that by the insertion of the new section 63A into the Sex Discrimination Act 1975, a "shifting" burden of proof is introduced into sex discrimination claims, making it necessary to set out fresh guidance as to the correct approach for employment tribunals to take.