Law reports

Bridges and others v Industrial Rubber plc [2004] All ER (D) 261 (Nov) EAT

Reports relating to this case:

Employment status: No mutuality of obligation means homeworkers not employees

Date:

13 May 2005

In Bridges and others v Industrial Rubber plc, the EAT holds that the irreducible minimum requirement for a contract of employment to exist is mutuality of obligation and a degree of control consistent with the position of an employer supervising an employee.

XpertHR is part of the LexisNexis® Risk Solutions Group portfolio of brands.

The materials and information included in the XpertHR service are provided for reference purposes only. They are not intended either as a substitute for professional advice or judgment or to provide legal or other advice with respect to particular circumstances. Use of the service is subject to our terms and conditions.

View our privacy policy, cookie policy and supported browsers.

Law reports

Bridges and others v Industrial Rubber plc [2004] All ER (D) 261 (Nov) EAT

Reports relating to this case:

Employment status: No mutuality of obligation means homeworkers not employees

Explore XpertHR

Learn more

Get in touch

Connect with us