Cases within C

• expand

  C Brewer & Sons Ltd v WR Dunstan [1978] IT/27499/78 (1 report relating to this case)

  • Shop guillotine need not be guarded

    Date:

    1 June 1979

    Guillotines used in a shop selling wall coverings, paints, wallboards etc had been used without incident for 18 years. They could not be said to constitute imminent risk of serious potential injury, said the Industrial Tribunal in C Brewer and Sons Ltd v WR Dunstan.

• expand

  C Meadows v Faithful Overalls Ltd [1977] IRLR 330 IT (1 report relating to this case)

  • Guarantee payments: What is a "reasonable requirement" for an employer to impose in a lay-off?

    Date:

    15 September 1977

    In Meadows v Faithful Overalls Ltd, the Industrial Tribunal holds that it was reasonable for the company to ask employees to wait at the factory until oil for the central heating system arrived.

• expand

  C-D v S-T ET/2505033/11 (1 report relating to this case)

  • Tribunal to ask ECJ to clarify legal protection for women who have children through a surrogate mother

    Date:

    9 February 2012

    The tribunal's reference to the European Court of Justice (ECJ) in this case could result in women who have a child through a surrogate mother being entitled to the same employment protection under EU law as conventional mothers.

• expand

  CA Treganowan v Robert Knee & Co Ltd [1975] IRLR 247 HC (1 report relating to this case)

  • CA Treganowan v Robert Knee & Co Ltd

    Date:

    1 August 1975

    In C A Treganowan v Robert Knee & Co Ltd [1975] IRLR 247 HC, the High Court held that a clash of personalities between employees constitutes "another substantial reason" for dismissal within the meaning of the Trade Union and Labour Relations Act 1992.

• expand

  Cabaj v Westminster City Council [1994] IRLR 530 EAT (1 report relating to this case)

  • Disciplinary rules and procedures: Flawed appeal procedure rendered dismissal unfair

    Date:

    1 November 1994

    An employee whose internal appeal against dismissal was heard and decided by an improperly constituted appeals tribunal was unfairly dismissed, holds the EAT in Cabaj v Westminster City Council.

• expand

  Caballero v Fondo de Garantia Salarial (Fogosa) Case C-244/94 ECJ (1 report relating to this case)

  • EC: ECJ case law round-up

    Date:

    1 January 2003

    In our latest round-up of decisions from the European Court of Justice (ECJ), we look at cases on equal pay, the principle of equal treatment as related to working conditions, the meaning of a transfer for the purposes of the business transfers Directive and, finally, guarantee payments to employees following the insolvency of their employers.

• expand

  Cabinet Office v Beavan and others [2014] IRLR 434 EAT (1 report relating to this case)

  • Case round-up

    Date:

    1 May 2014

    David Malamatenios is a partner, Linda Quinn and Krishna Santra senior associates and Melissa Powys-Rodrigues and Dominic Speedie associates at Colman Coyle Solicitors. They round up the latest rulings.

• expand

  Cable & Wireless plc v Muscat [2006] IRLR 354 CA (2 reports relating to this case)

  • Employment status/agency workers: Implied employment contract found between worker and end user

    Date:

    21 April 2006

    In Cable & Wireless plc v Muscat, the Court of Appeal holds that the guidance in Dacas v Brook Street Bureau (UK) Ltd is correct, and that tribunals should consider the possibility of an implied employment contract between the worker and end user where there is a triangular worker/agency/end-user arrangement.

  • Case round-up: Employment status

    Date:

    28 March 2006

    This week's case round-up from Eversheds, covering the employment status of agency workers.

• expand

  Cable Realisations Ltd v GMB Northern [2010] IRLR 42 EAT (1 report relating to this case)

  • Case round-up

    Date:

    1 February 2010

    Susannah Jarvis (associate) and Kate Williams (professional support lawyer) at Addleshaw Goddard analyse important rulings.

• expand

  Cadman v Health and Safety Executive [2004] IRLR 971 CA (2 reports relating to this case)

  • Cadman v Health and Safety Executive

    Date:

    1 December 2004

    In Cadman v Health and Safety Executive [2004] IRLR 971 CA, the Court of Appeal referred the case to the European Court of Justice to determine whether the use of length of service as a determinant of pay is indirectly discriminatory and whether it, therefore, needs to be objectively justified.

  • Length of service in equal pay referred to ECJ

    Date:

    1 November 2004

    The Court of Appeal in Cadman v Health and Safety Executive has referred the issue of length of service as a criterion justifying differences in pay to the European Court of Justice.