-
expand
Crawford v Network Rail Infrastructure Ltd [2019] IRLR 538 CA
(1 report relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 13 March 2019
In Network Rail Infrastructure Ltd v Crawford, the Court of Appeal held that, under reg.24 of the Working Time Regulations 1998 (SI 1998/1833), a compensatory rest period need not consist of an uninterrupted 20 minutes provided that it has the same value in terms of contributing to the worker's wellbeing.
-
expand
Cray Valley Ltd v Deltech Europe Ltd and others [2003] All ER (D) 315 (Apr) HC
(1 report relating to this case)
-
expand
Credit Suisse Asset Management Ltd v Armstrong and others [1996] IRLR 450 CA
(1 report relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 15 July 1996
There is no legal basis on which a court can, in enforcing a restrictive covenant by injunction, allow some kind of set-off against the period during which the employee has been on garden leave, holds the Court of Appeal in Armstrong and others v Credit Suisse Asset Management Ltd.
-
expand
Creditsights Ltd v Dhunna [2014] EWCA Civ 1238 CA
(1 report relating to this case)
-
expand
Creighton v Together Housing Association Ltd ET/2400978/2016
(1 report relating to this case)
-
expand
Cresswell and others v Board of Inland Revenue [1984] IRLR 190 HC
(1 report relating to this case)
-
expand
Crilly v Ballymagroarty Hazelbank Community Partnership NIIT/242/11
(1 report relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 5 January 2012
This Northern Ireland industrial tribunal decision is a good example of how an employer can indirectly discriminate against a female job applicant by making it a requirement to have a number of years' relevant experience within a narrow time frame, something that is more difficult for women who have been raising a family to achieve.
-
expand
Crisp v Iceland Foods Ltd ET/1604478/11 & ET/1600000/12
(1 report relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 13 June 2012
This is a rare example, along with Stone v Ramsay Health Care UK Operations Ltd ET/1400762/11, of an employment tribunal making wide-ranging recommendations to an employer, in this case asking it to provide equal opportunities training for sections of its HR function and senior management.
-
expand
Croft Vets Ltd and others v Butcher EAT/0430/12
(1 report relating to this case)
-
expand
Crofts v Roche Products Ltd 23 June 1995 CS
(1 report relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 1 August 1996
In Crofts v Roche Products Ltd, a firefighter who suffered a back injury while putting out a fire fails to win damages from his employer. The Court of Session holds that, given his training and experience, his employer could not anticipate he would attempt to lift or carry anything that would give rise to a risk of injury.