Cases within D

• expand

  D v Asda Stores Ltd ET/2501530/2015 (1 report relating to this case)

  • Unfair dismissal: manager who refused drug test should have set example

    Date:

    13 May 2016

    A manager who refused to take a "for cause" drug test was fairly dismissed because his employer was entitled to expect him to set an example for other staff, according to an employment tribunal.

• expand

  D v M [1996] IRLR 192 HC (1 report relating to this case)

  • Restrictive covenants: Clause providing for wrongful dismissal is unreasonable

    Date:

    15 May 1996

    Where in a restrictive covenant case there is evidence that an ex-employee's new business may be "permanently and adversely affected" by the grant of an interlocutory injunction to the former employer, a court has to give some consideration to the relative merits of the parties' cases as they would be determined at full trial, holds the High Court in D v M.

• expand

  D'Silva v NATFHE [2008] IRLR 412 EAT (2 reports relating to this case)

  • Case of the week: Answering a discrimination questionnaire

    Date:

    22 April 2008

    This week's case of the week, provided by Addleshaw Goddard, covers discrimination questionnaires.

  • Dr C D'Silva v NATFHE (now known as University and College Union) & Others

    Date:

    13 March 2008

    In Dr C D'Silva v NATFHE (now known as University and College Union) & Others EAT/0384/07, the Employment Appeal Tribunal has set out a reminder that a failure to respond to an employee's statutory discrimination questionnaire does not, without more, automatically give rise to an inference of discrimination.

• expand

  D'Souza v Lambeth London BC [2001] All ER (D) 346 (May) CA (2 reports relating to this case)

  • Employers may still be responsible for ex-staff

    Date:

    30 April 2002

    Government needs to clarify what residual liability companiesretain after employees have left, particularly over discrimination. By Jonathan Chamberlain, partner in the employment team at Wragge & Co.

  • Race discrimination: Post-employment discrimination was not actionable

    Date:

    15 July 2001

    An employment tribunal had no jurisdiction to consider a complaint that the decision not to reinstate an unfairly dismissed employee had been caused by continuing race discrimination and victimisation, holds the Court of Appeal in D'Souza v London Borough of Lambeth.

• expand

  D'Souza v London Borough of Lambeth [1997] IRLR 677 EAT (2 reports relating to this case)

  • Race discrimination: Uncapped award for failure to reinstate employee dismissed on racial grounds

    Date:

    15 December 1997

    An employee who was dismissed unfairly and unlawfully on grounds of race was entitled to an uncapped award of compensation under the Race Relations Act for the financial loss flowing from the dismissal when his employer failed to comply with an order for reinstatement, even though the dismissal occurred before the cap on such awards was lifted, holds the EAT in D'Souza v London Borough of Lambeth.

  • EAT awards £358,288 compensation

    Date:

    1 December 1997

    The EAT has awarded record compensation for race discrimination in D'Souza v London Borough of Lambeth.

• expand

  D’Souza v Lambeth London Borough Council [2000] All ER (D) 878 EAT (1 report relating to this case)

  • Post-employment race complaint barred

    Date:

    1 September 2000

    In D'Souza v London Borough of Lambeth the EAT has held it remains bound by the Court of Appeal's decision in Adekeye v The Post Office (No.2) to hold that there is no jurisdiction to hear a complaint of post-employment race discrimination.

• expand

  DA v Strathclyde Joint Police Board [2012] CSIH 75 CS (1 report relating to this case)

  • Case of the week: Dismissal of police worker who withheld information on criminal brother

    Date:

    7 December 2012

    This week's case of the week, provided by DLA Piper, covers the dismissal of a police worker who withheld information from the police on his criminal brother.

• expand

  Da'Bell v NSPCC [2010] IRLR 19 EAT (2 reports relating to this case)

  • Compensation for injury to feelings: EAT increases Vento compensation in line with inflation

    Date:

    26 January 2010

    In Da'Bell v NSPCC [2010] IRLR 19 EAT, the EAT has confirmed the increase of the Vento bands for compensation for injury to feelings in discrimination cases in line with inflation.

  • Da’Bell v NSPCC

    Date:

    19 December 2009

    The Employment Appeal Tribunal has held that the bands set out in Vento v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police (No.2) [2003] IRLR 102 CA for compensation for injury to feelings in discrimination cases should be increased to take account of inflation.

• expand

  Dabek v The Governing Body of The Radclyffe School and another ET/2401325/11 (1 report relating to this case)

  • Teacher fairly dismissed for adding content to pupils' GCSE work to boost grades

    Date:

    17 November 2011

    In this case, a diligent investigation resulted in the fair dismissal of a teacher for adding content to her pupils' GCSE work to improve their grades.

• expand

  Dabson v David Cover & Sons Ltd EAT/0374/10 (1 report relating to this case)

  • Case round-up

    Date:

    1 June 2011

    Claire Benson is managing associate and Helen Corbett, Sinead Jones, Helen Ward and Tori O'Neil are associates at Addleshaw Goddard LLP. They round up the latest rulings.