-
expand
Davies v Bridgend Country Borough Council ET/1603998/10
(1 report relating to this case)
-
expand
Davies v Farnborough College of Technology [2008] IRLR 14
(1 report relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 14 April 2008
In Davies v Farnborough College of Technology [2008] IRLR 14, the EAT held that a dismissal that involved a breach of step two of the statutory dismissal and disciplinary procedure was automatically unfair, even though a full and proper appeal had been heard. The tribunal was wrong to find that the appeal "cured" the defect in the original hearing. However, it was clear that a dismissal would have occurred even if the procedure had been properly followed, so the compensatory award was set at zero.
-
expand
Davies v London Borough of Haringey [2014] EWHC 3393 HC
(1 report relating to this case)
-
expand
Davies v Neath Port Talbot County Borough Council [1999] IRLR 769 EAT
(2 reports relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 1 December 1999
An employer contravened the principle of equal pay for equal work contained in Article 141 of the Treaty of Rome when it paid a part-time employee who attended a full-time union training course her normal part-time pay rather than payment for the hours actually spent attending the course, holds the EAT in Davies v Neath Port Talbot County Borough Council.
-
- Date:
- 1 November 1999
In Davies v Neath Port Talbot County Borough Council, the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) uses EC equal pay law to rule that an employer has to pay a trade union health and safety representative for all five days of a training course, even though it employs her on a part-time basis.
-
expand
Davies v Remploy Ltd ET/2407487/09
(1 report relating to this case)
-
expand
Davies v Sandwell Metropolitan Borough Council [2013] IRLR 374 CA
(1 report relating to this case)
-
expand
Davies v Scottish Courts and Tribunals Service ET/4104575/2017
(1 report relating to this case)
-
expand
Davies v Secretary of State for Social Security [1994] IT/43819/93
(1 report relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 1 June 1995
Even if the applicant's allegations of sexual harassment were true, the employer, which had a "comprehensive" complaints procedure that the applicant failed to make use of, would have escaped liability by virtue of the defence in s. 41(3) of the Sex Discrimination Act 1975, rules a Birmingham industrial tribunal in Davies v Secretary of State for Social Security.
-
expand
Dawson-Damer and others v Taylor Wessing LLP (Information Commissioner intervening) [2017] EWCA Civ 74 CA
(1 report relating to this case)
-
expand
Day v Health Education England and others [2017] IRLR 623 CA
(2 reports relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 31 December 2017
In Day v Health Education England and others [2017] IRLR 623 CA, the Court of Appeal held that a trainee doctor was not prevented from bringing a whistleblowing claim against the third-party introducer by the fact that he was engaged as a worker by the hospital trust to which he was assigned. His claim could proceed if the introducer could be said to substantially determine the conditions under which he worked in accordance with s.43K of the Employment Rights Act 1996.
-
- Date:
- 11 May 2017
The Court of Appeal has held that the employment tribunal incorrectly struck out the appellant's claim against Health Education England (HEE). The Court remitted the claim to a fresh tribunal to decide, as a preliminary issue, if the appellant was a worker in relation to HEE under the whistleblowing provisions of the Employment Rights Act 1996.