-
expand
E Coomes (Holdings) Ltd v Shields [1978] IRLR 263 CA
(1 report relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 1 June 1978
In E Coomes (Holdings) Ltd v Shields [1978] IRLR 263 CA, the Court of Appeal held that s.1(4) of the Equal Pay Act requires comparison to be made not between contractual obligations of the man and the woman, but between the things that each actually does and the frequency with which they are done.
-
expand
E Ivor Hughes Educational Foundation v Morris and others [2015] IRLR 696 EAT
(2 reports relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 30 September 2015
In E Ivor Hughes Educational Foundation v Morris and others [2015] IRLR 696 EAT, the EAT held that the obligation to consult on collective redundancies was triggered when it was decided that a school would close unless pupil numbers increased - rather than when the final decision to close was made once the required increase had not occurred.
-
- Date:
- 30 June 2015
The Employment Appeal Tribunal has held that a school's obligation to consult on collective redundancies arose when a provisional decision was made in February 2013 that the school would close unless the pupil intake number improved by April 2013.
-
expand
E-Zec Medical Transport Service Ltd v Gregory EAT/0192/08
(1 report relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 23 January 2009
In E-Zec Medical Transport Service Ltd v Gregory EAT/0192/08, the EAT upheld the employment tribunal's decision that the employee had been unfairly selected for redundancy, because the selection process involved inadequate consultation, and the selection criteria had been applied subjectively and did not allow for objective verification.
-
expand
EA Gibson Shipbrokers Ltd v Staples EAT/0263/07
(1 report relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 16 October 2007
In E A Gibson Shipbrokers Ltd v Staples EAT/0263/07, the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) has held that an employment tribunal had not explained its reasoning when deciding that an employer had failed to make reasonable adjustments with regard to a disabled employee. The employer was not required to pay full pay to the employee when contractual sick pay expired.
-
expand
EAD Solicitors LLP and others v Abrams [2015] IRLR 978 EAT
(1 report relating to this case)
-
expand
Ealing London Borough v Garry EAT/799/99
(1 report relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 1 January 2001
In London Borough of Ealing v Garry, the EAT holds that an employment tribunal either failed to identify anything that could truly be called a detriment to an employee who had unknowingly been the subject of a continuing investigation into suspected fraud or, if it had intended to say that her lack of awareness was a detriment, had reached a conclusion that was perverse.
-
expand
Earlam v (1) VMB Ltd and (2) Andrews [1994] IT/19199/94
(1 report relating to this case)
-
expand
East Dunbartonshire Council v (1) Trade Union backed claimants (2) Stefan Cross claimants EATS/0005/10
(1 report relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 1 April 2011
Rebekah Martin, Carly Mather, Kate Edminson and James Buckley, all associates at Addleshaw Goddard, detail the latest rulings.
-
expand
East Kent Hospitals University NHS Foundation Trust v Levy EAT/0232/17
(1 report relating to this case)
-
expand
East Lancashire Coachbuilders v Hilton EAT/0054/06
(1 report relating to this case)