Law reports

Edmonds v Lawson QC and others [2000] IRLR 391 CA

Reports relating to this case:

National minimum wage: Pupil barrister did not qualify for national minimum wage

Date:

15 April 2000

In Lawson and others v Edmonds, the Court of Appeal holds that, although a pupil barrister did make a legally binding contract with the members of the chambers where she was a pupil, she did not enter into, or work under, a contract of apprenticeship or an equivalent contract.

XpertHR is part of the LexisNexis® Risk Solutions Group portfolio of brands.

The materials and information included in the XpertHR service are provided for reference purposes only. They are not intended either as a substitute for professional advice or judgment or to provide legal or other advice with respect to particular circumstances. Use of the service is subject to our terms and conditions.

View our privacy policy, cookie policy and supported browsers.

Law reports

Edmonds v Lawson QC and others [2000] IRLR 391 CA

Reports relating to this case:

National minimum wage: Pupil barrister did not qualify for national minimum wage

Explore XpertHR

Learn more

Get in touch

Connect with us