-
expand
GMB v Man Truck & Bus UK Ltd [2000] IRLR 636 EAT
(1 report relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 1 September 2000
An employer that gave notice to terminate employees' existing contracts of employment, and offered to re-engage them on new terms, had a duty to consult employee representatives before imposing the new terms, holds the EAT in GMB v Man Truck & Bus UK Ltd.
-
expand
Gnahoua v Abellio London Ltd ET/2303661/2015
(1 report relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 20 April 2017
An employment tribunal has held that the employer breached the claimant's right to be accompanied when it refused to allow his chosen companions, trade union representatives, to accompany him at a disciplinary appeal hearing. However, it awarded compensation of £2 only, on the basis that the employer had understandable reasons for the refusal.
-
expand
Gogay v Hertfordshire County Council [2000] IRLR 703 CA
(1 report relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 1 November 2000
The suspension of a care worker in a children's home by her local authority employer, pending the outcome of an investigation into an allegation of child sexual abuse, amounted to a breach of the implied term of trust and confidence in her contract of employment, holds the Court of Appeal in Gogay v Hertfordshire County Council.
-
expand
Goldwater and others v Sellafield Ltd [2015] IRLR 381 EAT
(1 report relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 1 May 2015
David Malamatenios is a partner, Colin Makin, Sandra Martins and Krishna Santra are senior associates, and Hinal Raichura is a trainee at Colman Coyle Solicitors. They round up the latest rulings.
-
expand
Gomes v Henworth Ltd t/a Winkworth Estate Agents and another ET/3323775/2016
(1 report relating to this case)
-
expand
Goode v Marks & Spencer plc EAT/0442/09
(1 report relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 28 June 2010
In Goode v Marks & Spencer plc EAT/0442/09, the EAT held that an employment tribunal was right to find that an employee had not been dismissed because of having made a protected disclosure. There had been no qualifying or protected disclosure, but merely an opinion expressed about the employer's proposal for changes to a discretionary enhanced redundancy scheme.
-
expand
Goodwin v Cabletel UK Ltd [1997] IRLR 665 EAT
(1 report relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 1 December 1997
In Goodwin v Cabletel UK Ltd [1997] IRLR 665 EAT, the EAT held that the industrial tribunal had erred in holding that the dismissal of the appellant "designated employee" could not fall within the protection against dismissal for carrying out activities in connection with preventing or reducing risks to health and safety at work provided by the Employment Protection (Consolidation) Act because it was the way in which he carried out his health and safety activities, rather than the actual doing of them, which led to his dismissal.
-
expand
Goodwin v United Kingdom [2002] IRLR 664 ECHR
(1 report relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 1 August 2002
In Goodwin v United Kingdom (11 July 2002), the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) rules that the lack of recognition in the UK of a transsexual's new gender identity for legal purposes is a breach both of article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights (respect for private life) and article 12 (right to marry).
-
expand
Goodwin v Watkins [1994] IT/18964/94
(1 report relating to this case)
-
expand
Gover and others v Propertycare Ltd [2006] EWCA Civ 286 CA
(1 report relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 11 April 2006
The Court of Appeal has handed down an important decision emphasising the wide discretion that an employment tribunal has to make a 'Polkey reduction' - a ruling that dismissal would have occurred, or would probably have occurred even if a fair procedure or proper investigation had been followed - in an unfair dismissal case.