-
expand
Harron v Chief Constable of Dorset Police ET/3101466/2013
(1 report relating to this case)
-
expand
Harrow London Borough v Cunningham [1996] IRLR 256 EAT
(1 report relating to this case)
-
expand
Hart v English Heritage EAT/0055/06
(1 report relating to this case)
-
expand
Hartlepool Borough Council and another v Dolphin and others [2009] IRLR 168 EAT
(1 report relating to this case)
-
expand
Hartlepool Borough Council v Llewellyn and other appeals [2009] IRLR 796 EAT
(1 report relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 29 September 2009
In Hartlepool Borough Council v Llewellyn and other appeals [2009] IRLR 796 EAT, the EAT confirmed that male employees may institute contingent claims relying on female comparators who have instituted equal pay claims citing other more highly paid male colleagues. The male employees may be awarded arrears of pay for the same period as their comparators.
-
expand
Hartley and others v King Edward VI College [2017] IRLR 763 SC
(2 reports relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 31 December 2017
In Hartley and others v King Edward VI College [2017] IRLR 763 SC, the Supreme Court held that, when deducting pay from employees' wages in respect of their participation in strike action on the relevant days, the appropriate daily rate of deduction was one-365th of the employees' annual salary, rather than one-260th as had been applied by the employer.
-
- Date:
- 25 May 2017
The Supreme Court has held that the pay of teachers must be deducted at a daily rate of 1/365th of their annual salary, rather than 1/260th, for a one-day strike.
-
expand
Hartman v South Essex Mental Health and Community Care NHS Trust [2005] IRLR 293 CA
(1 report relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 25 March 2005
In Hartman v South Essex Mental Health and Community Care NHS Trust and other appeals, the Court of Appeal holds that, for a stress at work case to succeed, it must be shown that the injury was not too remote.
-
expand
Harvest Press Ltd v McCaffrey [1999] IRLR 778 EAT
(1 report relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 1 December 1999
In Harvest Press Ltd v McCaffrey [1999] IRLR 778 EAT, the Employment Appeal Tribunal held that if an employee is dismissed after walking out of work because of bullying or harassment by a colleague, he or she may be protected by the health and safety provisions of the Employment Rights Act 1996 and therefore regarded as automatically unfairly dismissed.
-
expand
Hasan v Shell International Shipping Services (Pte) Ltd and others EAT/0242/13
(1 report relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 1 April 2014
Neil Window is a trainee solicitor, Heather Marsh, Carly Mather, Associate and David Rintoul are associate solicitors, and Catherine Barker is managing associate at Addleshaw Goddard LLP. They round up the latest rulings.
-
expand
Hawkes v Ausin Group (UK) Ltd EAT/0070/18
(1 report relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 18 October 2018
In Hawkes v Ausin Group (UK) Ltd, the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) held that the employer's failure to hold a meeting with a reservist employee, before making the decision to dismiss, did not make the dismissal for some other substantial reason unfair.