-
expand
Henderson v Connect (South Tyneside) Ltd [2010] IRLR 466 EAT
(1 report relating to this case)
-
expand
Henderson v GCRM Ltd and others ETS/4102334/2022
(1 report relating to this case)
-
expand
Hendricks v Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis [2003] IRLR 96 CA
(1 report relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 21 March 2003
In Hendricks v The Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis, the Court of Appeal holds that an employment tribunal did not err in law in deciding that it had jurisdiction to hear a police officer's race and sex discrimination complaints, notwithstanding that none of the numerous alleged incidents of discriminatory treatment complained of occurred in the three-month period preceding the presentation of her originating application.
-
expand
Henny v Lifetimes Trading Ltd t/a Puddle-Ducks Nursery ET/2302340/12 and ET/2345302/12
(1 report relating to this case)
-
expand
Henry and others v London General Transport Services Ltd [2001] IRLR 132 EAT
(1 report relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 15 March 2001
An employment tribunal erred in ruling that employees who protested to their employer, by way of petition, against new terms and conditions of employment collectively agreed between the employer and the recognised trade union had not accepted those terms, holds the EAT in London General Transport Services Ltd v Henry and others.
-
expand
Henry and others v London General Transport Services Ltd [2002] IRLR 472 CA
(1 report relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 30 December 2002
In Henry and others v London General Transport Services Ltd, the Court of Appeal holds that, whereas clear evidence is required that a custom and practice has been incorporated into individual contracts of employment by virtue of the collective bargaining between an employer and the recognised trade union, such a custom and practice, once established, can be expected to cover all contractual terms.
-
expand
Henshaw v Touch Tanning Ltd ET/2605284/09
(1 report relating to this case)
-
expand
Hepworth Heating Ltd v Akers and others [2003] All ER (D) 33 (Jul) EAT
(1 report relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 31 December 2003
In Hepworth Heating Ltd v Akers and others [2003] All ER (D) 33 (Jul) EAT, the Employment Appeal Tribunal held that the employer had not used an unlawful act to compel acceptance of a cashless pay system. The employees might have been unhappy with the new terms, but there had been no duress.
-
expand
Her Majesty's Commissioners for Revenue & Customs v Rinaldi-Tranter EAT/0486/06
(1 report relating to this case)
-
expand
Herbai v Hungary [2020] IRLR 159 ECHR
(1 report relating to this case)