-
expand
K v L [2020] IRLR 916 EAT
(1 report relating to this case)
-
expand
Kabir v Bangladesh Women's Association [1993] IT/10026/92
(1 report relating to this case)
-
expand
Kachelmann v Bankhaus Hermann Lampe Kg [2001] IRLR 49 ECJ
(2 reports relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 15 December 2000
Interpreting a national rule in such a way as to prevent comparisons between part-time and full-time workers during a selection process for redundancy did not contravene the Equal Treatment Directive, rules the European Court of Justice in Kachelmann v Bankhaus Hermann Lampe KG.
-
- Date:
- 1 December 2000
In Kachelmann v Bankhaus Hermann Lampe KG the European Court of Justice has ruled that it is not contrary to the EC Equal Treatment Directive for a redundancy selection process not to compare part-time workers with full-time workers.
-
expand
Kaczor v Booker Ltd ET/3304520/11
(1 report relating to this case)
-
expand
Kakad v Consignia plc [2001] ET/5206424/00
(1 report relating to this case)
-
expand
Kalanke v Freie Hansestadt Bremen [1995] IRLR 660 ECJ
(2 reports relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 1 January 1996
In Kalanke v Freie Hansestadt Bremen, the European Court of Justice holds that the Equal Treatment Directive precludes national rules which guarantee women equally qualified with men automatic selection for appointment or promotion to posts in which women are underrepresented.
-
- Date:
- 1 January 1996
In Kalanke v Freie Hansestadt Bremen (17 October 1995) EOR65A, the European Court of Justice rules that a German law giving equally qualified women preference against men in selection for public sector jobs in which women were underrepresented did not fall within the exception to the principle of nondiscrimination permitted by Article 2(4) of the Equal Treatment Directive.
-
expand
Kamal v Wakefield Health Authority [1994] IT/29829/94
(1 report relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 1 September 1994
In Kamal v Wakefield Health Authority a Leeds industrial tribunal (Chair: J Prophet) has ruled that until new legislation has been enacted, there is no time limits on claims brought under Article 119 of the EC Treaty based on the decision of the House of Lords that the hours-per-week qualifying thresholds under the Employment Protection (Consolidation) Act are incompatible with EC law.
-
expand
Kambo and others v Vaulkhard 26 November 1984 CA
(1 report relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 1 May 1985
Kambo and others v Vaulkhard (CA, 26.11.84) EOR1C upholds a finding that a publican did not discriminate on racial grounds by excluding some black people from his premises in the mistaken belief that they were part of a group who had previously caused trouble. This case also illustrates the limitations of the damages provisions for indirect discrimination.
-
expand
Kampelmann v Landschaftsverband Westfalen-Lippe [1998] IRLR 333 ECJ
(1 report relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 15 September 1998
Where a member state has incorrectly transposed into national law the obligation of an employer under the EC Written Particulars Directive to briefly specify or describe an employee's work in a notification of the essential aspects of the contract, public sector employees may rely on it against their employers directly before their national courts, holds the European Court of Justice in (1) Kampelmann and others v Landschaftsverband Westfalen-Lippe (2) Stadtwerke Witten GmbH v Schade (3) Haseley v Stadtwerke Altena GmbH.
-
expand
Kanadia v (1) Royal Bank of Scotland Group plc (2) Styles [2005] ET/3300003/03
(1 report relating to this case)