-
expand
London Probation Board v Kirkpatrick [2005] IRLR 443 EAT
(1 report relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 13 May 2005
In London Probation Board v Kirkpatrick, the EAT holds that the tribunal was correct to conclude that it is open to the parties to agree reinstatement as a matter of contract. Such an agreement, albeit made after the break in employment has taken place, fills in the gap for the purposes of computing the period of continuous employment, under s.212 of the Employment Rights Act 1996.
-
expand
London Underground Ltd v Edwards (No 2) [1997] IRLR 157 EAT
(1 report relating to this case)
-
expand
London Underground Ltd v Edwards (No.2) [1998] IRLR 364 CA
(1 report relating to this case)
-
expand
London Underground Ltd v Edwards [1995] IRLR 355 EAT
(1 report relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 1 June 1995
In London Underground Ltd v Edwards the EAT has held that in determining whether an indirectly discriminatory requirement or condition was applied with the intention to treat a woman less favourably on grounds of sex, so as to permit an award of compensation, intention can be inferred from an employer's knowledge of the unfavourable consequences for the claimant as a woman.
-
expand
London Underground Ltd v Ferenc-Batchelor; Harding v London Underground Ltd [2003] IRLR 252 EAT
(1 report relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 18 July 2003
In London Underground Ltd v Ferenc-Batchelor and Harding v London Underground Ltd, the EAT holds an "informal oral warning" - which was in fact confirmed in writing, continued to have effect for up to 12 months, formed part of the employee's disciplinary record and could be taken into account by management if a formal disciplinary process was instigated - in reality constituted a "formal warning", giving rise to the statutory right of the employee to be accompanied to the disciplinary hearings that resulted in that warning being given.
-
expand
London Underground Ltd v National Union of Rail, Maritime and Transport Workers [1995] IRLR 636 CA
(1 report relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 1 November 1995
A trade union is not required to restrict its call for industrial action to those of its members who were members at the date of the ballot and who were given an opportunity to vote in it, holds the Court of Appeal in London Underground Ltd v National Union of Rail, Maritime and Transport Workers.
-
expand
Long v British Gas Trading Ltd ET/3327522/19
(1 report relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 14 April 2022
In Long v British Gas Trading Ltd, an employment tribunal held that the selection for redundancy of a part-time employee who was the mother of young children was sex discrimination, less favourable treatment because of part-time working and an unfair dismissal.
-
expand
Lonmar Global Risks Ltd v West and others [2011] IRLR 138 HC
(1 report relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 1 December 2010
Ceri Hughes, David Parry, and Carly Mather, associates at Addleshaw Goddard, detail the latest rulings.
-
expand
Look Ahead Housing and Care Ltd v Chetty and another EAT/0037/14
(1 report relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 1 February 2015
Carly Mather is a managing associate, Gerri Hurst and Lucy Sorrell are associates, Mona Jackson is a trainee solicitor and Richard Branson is a paralegal at Addleshaw Goddard LLP. They round up the latest rulings.
-
expand
López Ribalda and others v Spain [2018] IRLR 358 ECHR
(1 report relating to this case)