-
expand
Malik v British Home Stores [1980] ET/2901/79
(1 report relating to this case)
-
expand
Malone and others v British Airways plc [2010] IRLR 431 HC
(2 reports relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 1 June 2010
In Malone and others v British Airways plc [2010] IRLR 431 HC, the High Court held that the provisions of a collective agreement purporting to set "minimum" cabin crew numbers for different routes and types of craft were not incorporated into individual employees' contracts of employment. In any event, an injunction would not be granted to restrain the employer from reducing cabin crew numbers below the levels specified, and, even if there had been a breach of contract, any award for damages would be for a nominal amount only.
-
- Date:
- 1 March 2010
Susannah Jarvis (associate) and Kate Williams (professional support lawyer), Addleshaw Goddard, analyse important recent rulings.
-
expand
Malone and others v British Airways plc [2011] IRLR 32 CA
(1 report relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 6 April 2011
In Malone and others v British Airways Plc [2011] IRLR 32 CA, the Court of Appeal held that the provisions of a collective agreement that purported to set "minimum" cabin crew numbers for different routes and types of aircraft were not incorporated into individual employees' contracts of employment. The provisions amounted to a collective undertaking to operate with minimum numbers so as to protect jobs and guard against excessive workloads, and were binding in honour only.
-
expand
Manchester City Council v Thurston [2002] IRLR 319 EAT
(1 report relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 22 July 2002
An employer was not entitled to withhold sick pay from an employee who took sick leave because of anxiety and depression immediately after being disciplined for misconduct, notwithstanding a contractual clause excluding such entitlement where sickness was "due, or attributable, to his own misconduct", the EAT holds in Manchester City Council v Thurston.
-
expand
Manchester College v Cocliff EAT/0035/10
(1 report relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 24 November 2010
In Manchester College v Cocliff EAT/0035/10, the EAT held that an employment tribunal erred when it decided that there had been less favourable treatment on grounds of fixed-term status because it had found that any difference in terms was not objectively justifiable. Tribunals should first consider whether or not any less favourable treatment is on grounds of fixed-term status. Only if the answer is yes should they move on to consider the defence of objective justification.
-
expand
Mandla and another v Lee and others [1983] IRLR 209 HL
(1 report relating to this case)
-
expand
Mann v NSL Ltd ET/2600739/2015
(1 report relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 8 June 2016
An employment tribunal has held that an employer fairly dismissed an employee for using a racist term in the presence of white colleagues. The tribunal was unimpressed with the claimant's arguments that he did not realise anyone was listening, did not intend to offend, and the word is "street talk" where he lives.
-
expand
Manor Oak (PMG) Ltd v Kelly EATS/0070/08
(1 report relating to this case)
-
expand
Mansfield Hosiery Mills Ltd v M Bromley [1977] IRLR 301 EAT
(1 report relating to this case)
-
expand
Marathon Asset Management LLP and another v Seddon and others [2017] IRLR 503 HC
(1 report relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 6 March 2017
The High Court has held that two ex-employees breached their contracts of employment by misusing confidential information belonging to their former employer's business. However, the High Court found that the employer had not suffered any financial loss and that it was entitled to only nominal damages of £1 from each employee.