-
expand
Mathieson and another v United News Shops Ltd EAT/554/94
(1 report relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 1 July 1995
An industrial tribunal was entitled to find that fundamental changes in the nature of the business carried on in a hospital shop after it was contracted-out to a private operator had "destroyed" any identity between the latter business and its predecessor, holds the EAT in Mathieson and another v United News Shops Ltd.
-
expand
Matier v Spring & Airbrake Ireland Ltd [2018] IT/5465/18
(1 report relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 24 October 2018
In Matier v Spring & Airbrake Ireland Ltd, a Northern Ireland industrial tribunal awarded £3,155 for age discrimination to a jobseeker who was told that a prospective employer was "looking for a younger person".
-
expand
Matthews and others v Kent & Medway Towns Fire Authority and others [2006] IRLR 367 HL
(1 report relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 19 May 2006
In Matthews and others v Kent & Medway Towns Fire Authority and others [2006] UKHL 8, the House of Lords held that in the assessment of whether full- and part-time workers are employed on broadly similar work, both the differences and the similarities between the two groups should be considered and an overall assessment made.
-
expand
Mattu v University Hospitals of Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust [2012] IRLR 661 CA
(1 report relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 22 May 2012
The Court of Appeal has held that an NHS trust's decision to dismiss a doctor, which made it more difficult for him to practise in his chosen profession, did not engage his right to a fair and public hearing under the European Convention on Human Rights.
-
expand
Matuszowicz v Kingston Upon Hull City Council [2009] IRLR 288 CA
(1 report relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 19 May 2009
In Matuszowicz v Kingston Upon Hull City Council [2009] IRLR 288 CA, the Court of Appeal held that, where an employee relies on the employer's alleged continuing omission to make a reasonable adjustment, in the absence of evidence as to the date of the employer's decision, the time limit for instituting tribunal proceedings runs from the end of the period during which the employer might reasonably have been expected to effect the adjustment, unless there is an earlier inconsistent act.
-
expand
Max-Planck-Gesellschaft zur Förderung der Wissenschaften eV v Shimizu Case C-684/16 ECJ
(1 report relating to this case)
-
expand
Maxwell v Holmes (Lord Chancellor's Department) [1995] IT/29941/94
(1 report relating to this case)
-
expand
May Gurney Ltd v Adshead and others EAT/0150/06
(1 report relating to this case)
-
expand
Mayor and Burgesses of the London Borough of Tower Hamlets v Wooster EAT/0441/08
(1 report relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 23 November 2009
In Mayor and Burgesses of the London Borough of Tower Hamlets v Wooster EAT/0441/08, the EAT upheld a finding that the redundancy dismissal of a 49-year-old employee amounted to age discrimination. The tribunal was entitled to find that the employer could have found alternative work for him, but that it had failed to do so because it was concerned that, if he remained employed up to the age of 50, he would be entitled to a more generous early retirement package.
-
expand
Mayr v Bäckerei Und Konditorei Gerhard Flöckner OHG [2008] IRLR 387 ECJ
(1 report relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 28 May 2008
In Mayr v Bäckerei und Konditorei Gerhard Flockner OHG [2008] IRLR 387, the ECJ held that the protection afforded by the Pregnant Workers Directive against dismissal on grounds of pregnancy does not extend to a woman undergoing IVF treatment who was dismissed when in-vitro-fertilised ova existed but had not yet been transferred to her uterus. However, if she was dismissed essentially because she had undergone this advanced stage of IVF treatment, her dismissal would amount to direct sex discrimination contrary to the Equal Treatment Directive.