-
expand
Nationwide Building Society v Benn and others [2010] IRLR 922 EAT
(1 report relating to this case)
-
expand
Naveed v Aslam and another t/a Chilli Pink ET/1603968/2011
(1 report relating to this case)
-
expand
Nayak v Royal Mail Group Ltd EATS/0011/15
(1 report relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 1 June 2016
Beth Staniland is a trainee solicitor, and Emma Cousins, Ciara Jenkins, Iain Naylor and Lucy Sorell are associates at Addleshaw Goddard LLP. They round up the latest rulings.
-
expand
Ndebele v A Bubble Company Ltd ET/2302428/2016
(1 report relating to this case)
-
expand
Neckles v National Westminster Bank 11 July 2003 CA
(1 report relating to this case)
-
expand
Neidel v Stadt Frankfurt am Main [2012] IRLR 607 ECJ
(1 report relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 9 May 2012
The European Court of Justice has held that German legislation allowing for a carry-over period for untaken holiday of nine months, with the result that public servants forfeit their leave if it has not been taken within the period of nine months after the end of the leave year because of sickness, is unlawful.
-
expand
Neil v Strathclyde Regional Council [1984] IRLR 14 CS
(1 report relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 7 February 1984
Where employers pay for an employee's training, they can require a reasonable minimum period of service after the training is completed. In Strathclyde Regional Council v Neil, the Sheriff Court holds that a contractual provision for repayment by the employee of the costs incurred is not a penalty and can be enforced, provided the amount relates to the loss suffered by the employer.
-
expand
Nejjary v Aramark Ltd EAT/0054/12
(1 report relating to this case)
-
expand
Nelhams v Sandells Maintenance Ltd and Gillespie (UK) Ltd (1996) 46 Con LR 40 CA
(1 report relating to this case)
-
expand
Nelson v Carillion Services Ltd [2003] IRLR 428 CA
(1 report relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 5 September 2003
In Nelson v Carillion Services Ltd, the Court of Appeal holds that the burden of proof in indirect sex discrimination cases should be approached in the same way irrespective of whether a case is brought under Article 141 (previously 119) of the EC Treaty of Rome, the Sex Discrimination Act 1975 or the Equal Pay Act 1970.