Cases within P

• expand

  Parkes v Meridian Ltd & Ors [2007] EWHC B1 (QB) (1 report relating to this case)

  • Date of knowledge on below-90dB(A) hearing damage risk set at 1990

    Date:

    1 May 2007

    An employer will not normally be liable for injury following exposure below officially promulgated occupational exposure limits.

• expand

  Parkins v Sodexho Ltd [2002] IRLR 109 EAT (2 reports relating to this case)

  • Blowing the whistle

    Date:

    1 April 2002

    The outcome of a recent employment tribunal could pave the way for claims of unfair dismissal under the whistleblowing legislation - without the one year service required. Malcolm Pike looks at practical ways employers can protect themselves.

  • Public interest disclosure: Breach of employment contract can be a protected disclosure

    Date:

    11 March 2002

    In Parkins v Sodexho Ltd, the EAT holds that a protected disclosure for the purposes of s.43B Employment Rights Act 1996 can relate to a breach of the employee's own contract of employment.

• expand

  Parkinson v March Consulting Ltd [1997] IRLR 308 CA (1 report relating to this case)

  • Reason for dismissal: Determining reason for dismissal where employee was given notice

    Date:

    1 June 1997

    Where employment is terminated by notice, the employer's reason for dismissal has to be determined both by reference to its reason when dismissal occurs and by reference to its reason for giving the prior notice to terminate, holds a majority of the Court of Appeal in Parkinson v March Consulting Ltd.

• expand

  Parkinson v March Consulting Ltd EAT/776/94 (1 report relating to this case)

  • Reorganisation: Events during notice period relevant to whether dismissal is for "SOSR"

    Date:

    15 June 1996

    In Parkinson v March Consulting Ltd the EAT upholds an industrial tribunal's decision that an employee was dismissed for "some other substantial reason", namely the reorganisation of his employer's business, notwithstanding that the reorganisation was not completed until a considerable time after his employment terminated.

• expand

  Parkwood Leisure Ltd v Alemo-Herron and others [2010] EWCA Civ 24 CA (2 reports relating to this case)

  The conclusion of this case was that the European Court of Justice decided in Alemo-Herron and others v Parkwood Leisure Ltd Case C-426/11 ECJ that a transferee is not bound by "dynamic" clauses in contracts of employment referring to collective agreements negotiated after the transfer, where that transferee cannot participate in the negotiation process.

  • TUPE: Transferee not bound by transferor's post-transfer pay agreement

    Date:

    13 April 2010

    In Parkwood Leisure Ltd v Alemo-Herron and others [2010] EWCA Civ 24 CA, the Court of Appeal held that, where the transfer of an undertaking occurs, and the transferring employees' contracts contain a clause referring to a collective agreement between the transferor and the relevant union, the transferee is not obliged to recognise wage increases agreed by the transferor and the union after the transfer has occurred resulting from negotiations to which the transferee was not a party.

  • Parkwood Leisure Ltd v Alemo-Herron and others

    Date:

    3 February 2010

    The Court of Appeal has restored an employment tribunal decision that a transferee was not bound by the terms of a pay increase made under a collective agreement that was incorporated into the contracts before the transfer, where the increase was made under an agreement reached after the transfer in which the transferee played no part.

• expand

  Parkwood Leisure Ltd v Alemo-Herron and others [2011] IRLR 696 SC (2 reports relating to this case)

  In Alemo-Herron and others v Parkwood Leisure Ltd Case C-426/11 ECJ, the European Court of Justice held that a transferee is not bound by "dynamic" clauses in contracts of employment referring to collective agreements negotiated after the transfer, where that transferee cannot participate in the negotiation process.

  • TUPE: contractors exposed on pay bargaining

    Date:

    1 May 2013

    Private companies that acquire staff from the public sector may still have to honour pre-existing collective agreements, writes Christopher Mordue.

  • TUPE: Supreme Court asks ECJ if transferee has to honour pay agreement signed by transferor

    Date:

    16 June 2011

    The Supreme Court has referred to the European Court of Justice the question of whether or not the TUPE Regulations should be given a "dynamic" interpretation, in the context of a dispute over a transferee's failure to honour the terms of a pay increase made under a collective agreement that was incorporated into the contracts of employment before the transfer. 

• expand

  Parlett v Guppys (Bridport) Ltd (No 2) [1999] OPLR 309 CA (1 report relating to this case)

  • In court 1999

    Date:

    1 January 2000

    Our 10th annual round-up of court and tribunal cases concerning pensions and retirement issues encompasses 38 judgments. Last year saw some important decisions, but fewer cases overall than in recent years.

• expand

  Parliamentary Commissioner for Administration and another v Fernandez [2004] IRLR 22 EAT (2 reports relating to this case)

  • Equal pay: case law update

    Date:

    2 March 2007

    This article looks at some of the significant judgments in the area of equal pay over the past year and their implications.

  • Equal pay: Non-discriminatory factor need not be justified to be "material"

    Date:

    6 February 2004

    In Parliamentary Commissioner for Administration and another v Fernandez, the EAT holds that an employer was not required objectively to justify the difference in pay between the complainant and his female comparator, in circumstances where there was no suggestion that the factors relied on by the employer in seeking to establish the "material factor" defence to the equal pay claim were indirectly discriminatory.

• expand

  Parmar v Marks & Spencer plc [2001] ET/2404824/00 (1 report relating to this case)

  • Case digest

    Date:

    1 March 2002

    Hilary Slater, consultant with Cobbetts solicitors, provides a round-up of employment tribunal decisions on discrimination.

• expand

  Parmer v East Leicester Medical Practice EAT/0490/10 (1 report relating to this case)

  • Judicial proceedings immunity extends to victimisation claims

    Date:

    30 March 2011

    The Employment Appeal Tribunal has held that the principle of judicial proceedings immunity applies to all types of discrimination claims, including victimisation.