Cases within Q

• expand

  QBE Management Services (UK) Ltd v Dymoke and others [2012] IRLR 458 HC (1 report relating to this case)

  • Case round-up

    Date:

    1 March 2012

    David Malamatenios and Georgina Kyriacou are partners, and Krishna Santra, Colin Makin and Sandra Martins are associates at Colman Coyle Solicitors. They round up the latest rulings.

• expand

  Qlog Ltd v O'Brien and others EAT/0301/13 (1 report relating to this case)

  • Case round-up

    Date:

    1 June 2014

    Amanda Steadman is a professional support lawyer and Ed Gregory, Rosie Kight and Joanne Magill are associate solicitors at Addleshaw Goddard LLP. They round up the latest rulings.

• expand

  Qua v John Ford Morrison Solicitors [2003] IRLR 184 EAT (5 reports relating to this case)

  • Time off for dependants: First consideration of dependants' leave entitlement

    Date:

    9 May 2003

    In Qua v John Ford Morrison Solicitors, the EAT holds that the statutory right to take a "reasonable amount of time off" to care for dependants is a right that applies during working hours to enable employees to deal with the variety of specified unexpected or sudden events affecting their dependants, and in order to make any "necessary" longer-term arrangements for their care.

  • Case round-up

    Date:

    1 May 2003

    Our resident experts at Pinsent Curtis Biddle bring you a comprehensive update on all the latest decisions that could affect your organisation, and advice on what to do about them.

  • Dependants leave is not a case for unfair dismissal

    Date:

    1 April 2003

    Employees with caring responsibilities are entitled to take 'dependants leave' when a child is ill, but employers should keep extensive records of when they are absent. By Danielle Kingdon, employment partner, Osbourne Clarke.

  • Guidelines on dependant leave

    Date:

    1 April 2003

    In Qua v John Ford Morrison Solicitors (14 January 2003), the EAT confirms that the statutory right to time off in respect of dependants is a right to deal with unexpected events, and is not intended to allow an employee to provide care for a sick dependant beyond the reasonable amount necessary to enable them to deal with the immediate crisis.

  • Case round-up: unfair dismissal compensation; temporary workers and time off for dependants

    Date:

    11 February 2003

    This week's case round-up, covering: unfair dismissal and compensation; temporary workers; and time off for dependants.

• expand

  Quaglinos Restaurant Ltd v Ms Hamilton-Freed EAT 594/01 (1 report relating to this case)

  • Points of procedure

    Date:

    5 August 2002

    A round-up of recent noteworthy decisions on practice and procedure in the employment tribunals and the EAT.

• expand

  Quaker Oats Ltd v Siraj EAT/280/98 (1 report relating to this case)

  • Misconduct: Alcohol policy did not apply to dismissed employee

    Date:

    1 December 1999

    In Quaker Oats Ltd v Siraj, the EAT holds that an employment tribunal erred in law in concluding that an employer's non-contractual policy for employees with alcohol-related problems applied to an employee who was dismissed for turning up for work obviously drunk.

• expand

  Quality Solicitors Cmht v Tunstall EAT/0105/14 (1 report relating to this case)

  • Case round-up

    Date:

    1 November 2014

    Helen Almond is professional support lawyer, Nigel Cousin and Victoria Davies managing associates and Iain Naylor and Andrew Nealey associates Addleshaw Goddard LLP. They round up the latest rulings.

• expand

  Quarcoopome v Sock Shop Holdings Ltd [1995] IRLR 353 EAT (2 reports relating to this case)

  • Race discrimination: "Race discrimination" complaint was all inclusive

    Date:

    1 September 1995

    In Quarcoopome v Sock Shop Holdings Ltd, the EAT holds that an originating application to an industrial tribunal, although it complained merely of "race discrimination", incorporated any claim which may be made on the grounds of race under the Race Relations Act 1976.

  • Direct and indirect claim covered by IT1

    Date:

    1 July 1995

    In Quarcoopome v Sock Shop Holdings Ltd (7 April 1995) EOR62E, the EAT holds that, for time limit purposes, an originating application that makes a claim for race discrimination incorporates any claim for race discrimination, whether it be direct, indirect or by way of victimisation.

• expand

  Quashie v Methodist Homes Housing Association [2010] ET/2301275/2009 (1 report relating to this case)

  • Violence in the workplace: employment tribunal decisions

    Date:

    16 March 2011

    This article summarises the main issues and outcomes in five employment tribunal cases that involve violence in a workplace context.

• expand

  Quashie v Stringfellow Restaurants Ltd [2013] IRLR 99 CA (1 report relating to this case)

  • Case of the week: Employment status

    Date:

    14 February 2013

    This week's case of the week, provided by DLA Piper, covers the employment status of a dancer in Stringfellows.

• expand

  Quashie v Stringfellows Restaurants Ltd [2012] IRLR 536 EAT (1 report relating to this case)

  In Quashie v Stringfellow Restaurants Ltd [2013] IRLR 99 CA, the Court of Appeal disagreed with the Employment Appeal Tribunal and restored the employment tribunal decision that the claimant was not an employee.

  • Case of the week: Employment status

    Date:

    11 July 2012

    This week's case of the week, provided by DLA Piper, covers employment status.