-
expand
Royal Mail Ltd v Jhuti [2018] IRLR 251 CA
(2 reports relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 29 January 2018
In Royal Mail Ltd v Jhuti [2018] IRLR 251 CA, the Court of Appeal held that the motivation of a manager who manipulated evidence to procure the dismissal of a whistleblowing employee could not be attributed to the employer, as the decision to dismiss was taken by a manager who was not motivated by the employee's protected disclosures.
-
- Date:
- 30 October 2017
The Court of Appeal has held that a claimant cannot succeed in a whistleblowing unfair dismissal claim where the decision-maker was unaware of the protected disclosure at the time of the decision to dismiss.
-
expand
Royal Mencap Society v Tomlinson-Blake; Shannon v Rampersad and another (t/a Clifton House Residential Home) [2018] IRLR 932 CA
(1 report relating to this case)
-
expand
Royal National Lifeboat Institution v Bushaway [2005] IRLR 674 EAT
(1 report relating to this case)
-
expand
Royal Surrey County NHS Foundation Trust v Drzymala EAT/0063/17
(1 report relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 26 January 2018
In Royal Surrey County NHS Foundation Trust v Drzymala, the Employment Appeal Tribunal considered the fairness of an employee's dismissal by her employer's decision not to renew her fixed-term contract, including the effect of the employer's compliance with the Fixed-term Employees (Prevention of Less Favourable Treatment) Regulations 2002.
-
expand
RR Donnelley Global Document Solutions Group Ltd v Besagni and others; NSL Ltd v Besagni and others EAT/0397/13 & EAT/0398/13
(1 report relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 28 May 2014
The Employment Appeal Tribunal has held that a requirement to work in a different location following a TUPE transfer does not amount to a change in the workforce and is not, therefore, an economic, technical or organisational reason entailing changes in the workforce within the meaning of reg.7(2) of the Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 2006 (SI 2006/246).
-
expand
RS Components Ltd v RE Irwin [1973] IRLR 239 NIRC
(1 report relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 1 August 1973
In RS Components Ltd v RE Irwin [1973] IRLR 239 NIRC, the National Industrial Relations Court held that it was reasonable to terminate the employment of an employee who refused to sign a covenant restricting him operating in competition with the company for one year after leaving the company's employment.
-
expand
Rubins v Latvia [2015] IRLR 319 ECHR
(1 report relating to this case)
-
expand
Ruda v Tei Ltd ET/1807582/10
(1 report relating to this case)
-
expand
Rudling v PSA Services and another [1994] IT/52828/93
(1 report relating to this case)
-
expand
Ruizo v (1) Tesco Stores Ltd and (2) Lea [1995] IT/53435/93
(2 reports relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 1 June 1995
The use of the phrase "Goddamn Yank" was racial abuse, rules a Manchester industrial tribunal (Chair: C Porter) in Ruizo v (1) Tesco Stores Ltd and (2) Lea, rejecting management's view that such a phrase was simply workplace banter.
-
- Date:
- 1 June 1995
In addition to awarding £2,500 for injury to feelings, a Manchester industrial tribunal (Chair: C Porter) in Ruizo v (1) Tesco Stores Ltd and (2) Lea awards a further £1,500 aggravated damages for the employer's lack of contrition and continuing failure to address or alleviate the problem of racial abuse.