In Riley v Base (t/a GL1 Heating), the EAT holds that the employment tribunal failed correctly to apply the reverse burden of proof contained in s.63A of the Sex Discrimination Act 1975. The employer had admitted that he would not physically abuse a female apprentice in the same way as he would a male. Such an admission clearly could not constitute an adequate explanation, meaning that the complaint had to be upheld.
XpertHR is part of the LexisNexis® Risk Solutions Group portfolio of brands.
The materials and information included in the XpertHR service are provided for reference purposes only. They are not intended either as a substitute for professional advice or judgment or to provide legal or other advice with respect to particular circumstances. Use of the service is subject to our terms and conditions.
Copyright © 2021 LexisNexis Risk Solutions Group
© 2021 LexisNexis Risk Solutions Group.