Rowstock Ltd and another v Jessemey  IRLR 368 CA
Reports relating to this case:
- 11 October 2014
In Rowstock Ltd and another v Jessemey  IRLR 368 CA, the Court of Appeal held that the apparent exclusion of post-employment victimisation from the Equality Act 2010 was the result of an inadvertent drafting error and that such conduct is indeed proscribed by the Act.
- 28 February 2014
The Court of Appeal has held that the Equality Act 2010 can be interpreted to cover post-employment victimisation, resolving the conflict created by two contradictory EAT decisions on this issue.