-
expand
Sellers v Buckinghamshire Healthcare NHS Trust ET/3302596/2012
(1 report relating to this case)
-
expand
Serco Ltd v Lawson; Botham v Ministry of Defence; Crofts and others v Veta Ltd and others [2006] IRLR 289 HL
(2 reports relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 17 November 2006
In Lawson v Serco Ltd; Botham v Ministry of Defence; Crofts and others v Veta Ltd and others [2006] IRLR 289 HL, the House of Lords holds that employees will be entitled to claim unfair dismissal if working or based in Great Britain at the time of the dismissal. An employee posted abroad but retaining a strong connection with Great Britain may also be able to bring a claim.
-
- Date:
- 1 March 2006
Sophy Robinson and Karen Fletcher of Addleshaw Goddard outline the latest legal rulings and explain what you need to know to avoid tribunals.
-
expand
Sethi v Accord Operations Ltd [2007] ET/3201823/06
(1 report relating to this case)
-
expand
SG & R Valuation Service Co LLC v Boudrais and others [2008] IRLR 770 HC
(1 report relating to this case)
-
expand
Shackletons Garden Centre Ltd v Lowe EAT/0161/10
(1 report relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 18 January 2011
In Shackletons Garden Centre Ltd v Lowe EAT/0161/10, the EAT held that an employment tribunal had insufficient evidence for its finding that an employee returning from maternity leave suffered indirect sex discrimination when her employer required her to work weekend shifts on the same basis as the other sales staff.
-
expand
Shah v George Grassic t/a The Suite Factory [1995] IT/58764/94
(1 report relating to this case)
-
expand
Shah v Rochdale Metropolitan Borough Council [1995] IT/50157/93
(1 report relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 1 September 1995
An employee who had made a race discrimination complaint was later unlawfully victimised when he was not, in accordance with normal practice, informed why his application for promotion had been unsuccessful, rules a Manchester industrial tribunal (Chair: C T Grazin) in Shah v Rochdale Metropolitan Borough Council.
-
expand
Shamoon v Chief Constable of the Royal Ulster Constabulary [2003] IRLR 285 HL
(1 report relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 9 May 2003
In Shamoon v Chief Constable of the Royal Ulster Constabulary, the House of Lords holds that in cases where a complainant alleges direct sex discrimination, the statutory comparison requires that all the circumstances that are relevant to the way the complainant was treated are the same as, or not materially different from, the circumstances of the comparator.
-
expand
Shanahan Engineering v Unite the Union EAT/0411/09
(2 reports relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 14 June 2010
In Shanahan Engineering v Unite the Union EAT/0411/09, the EAT held that an employment tribunal was right to find that, in relation to collective redundancy consultation, although a customer's instruction amounted to "special circumstances", absolving the employer of the need to start consultation 30 days in advance of the first redundancy, it did not absolve it of all obligations to consult. However, the tribunal should have taken into account the special circumstances of the case in setting the level of the protective award.
-
- Date:
- 1 March 2010
Susannah Jarvis (associate) and Kate Williams (professional support lawyer), Addleshaw Goddard, analyse important recent rulings.
-
expand
Shanks v Unilever plc and others [2017] EWCA Civ 2 CA
(1 report relating to this case)