In Sinclair v Neighbour  2 QB 279 CA, the Court of Appeal held that, even though no dishonesty was involved, because the employee had taken his employer's money for a purpose of which he knew the employer would disapprove, the conduct was sufficiently reprehensible to warrant summary dismissal.
XpertHR is part of the LexisNexis® Risk Solutions Group portfolio of brands.
The materials and information included in the XpertHR service are provided for reference purposes only. They are not intended either as a substitute for professional advice or judgment or to provide legal or other advice with respect to particular circumstances. Use of the service is subject to our terms and conditions.
Copyright © 2021 LexisNexis Risk Solutions Group
© 2021 LexisNexis Risk Solutions Group.