Cases within T

• expand

  T & G (Scotland) v Amicus and others (and related claim) EAT/0067/03 (1 report relating to this case)

  • Case round up

    Date:

    1 June 2004

    Our resident experts at Pinsents bring you a comprehensive update on all the latest decisions that could affect your organisation, and advice on what to do about them

• expand

  T & K Home Improvements Ltd v Skilton [2000] IRLR 595 CA (1 report relating to this case)

  • Wrongful dismissal: Dismissal "with immediate effect" did not eliminate right to pay in lieu of notice

    Date:

    15 January 2000

    A term of a contract of employment providing that the employee could be dismissed "with immediate effect" if he missed performance targets did not terminate or exclude his right, under other provisions of the contract, to a payment in lieu of three months' notice, holds the Court of Appeal in T & K Home Improvements Ltd v Skilton.

• expand

  T & K Home Improvements Ltd v Skilton EAT/486/98 (1 report relating to this case)

  • Breach of contract: Ambiguously worded provision of contract did not exclude right to pay in lieu of notice

    Date:

    1 October 1999

    A clause in a contract of employment providing that the employee could be dismissed with immediate effect, if he failed to achieve his performance target was ambiguous, holds the EAT in T & K Home Improvements Ltd v Skilton, and did not of itself exclude the employee's right to pay for the contractual notice period.

• expand

  T Mobile (UK) Ltd v Singleton EAT/0410/10 (1 report relating to this case)

  • No positive duty on employer to correct claimant's ET1 deadline mistake

    Date:

    28 March 2011

    The Employment Appeal Tribunal has held that the employment tribunal was wrong to decide that employers have a positive duty to correct employees or ex-employees in relation to misapprehensions that they have about time limits for bringing claims. 

• expand

  T-Systems Ltd v Lewis EAT/0042/15 (2 reports relating to this case)

  • Case round-up

    Date:

    1 December 2015

    Krishna Santra and Sandra Martins are senior associates at Colman Coyle Solicitors. They round up the latest rulings.

  • Case round-up

    Date:

    1 November 2015

    Jessica Alice-Curtis is a trainee solicitor, Lucy Melville is a paralegal and Nigel Cousin, David Rintoul and Rachael Wake are associates at Addleshaw Goddard LLP. They round up the latest rulings.

• expand

  Taiwo v Olaigbe and another ET/2389629/11 (1 report relating to this case)

  The Court of Appeal has now confirmed in Jessemey v Rowstock Ltd and another [2014] EWCA Civ 185 CA that the Equality Act 2010 can be interpreted to cover post-employment victimisation.

  • Equality Act 2010: employment tribunal allows post-employment victimisation claim to proceed

    Date:

    17 October 2012

    This pre-hearing review highlights a drafting error in the Equality Act 2010 that means that post-employment victimisation is not covered. The decision that the claimant's post-employment victimisation claim should be allowed to proceed contrasts with the first-instance decision in Jessemey v Rowstock Ltd and another ET/2700838/11 and ET/2701156/11, in which the employment tribunal rejected the same sort of claim.

• expand

  Talbot and another v Grundy and another [1995] IRLR 269 HL (1 report relating to this case)

  • Insolvency: Administrators and receivers liable on adopted contracts

    Date:

    1 April 1995

    Where the conduct of an administrator or receiver of a company amounts to an election to treat a continued contract of employment as giving rise to a separate liability in the administration or receivership, that contract is "adopted" within the meaning of the Insolvency Act 1986, holds the House of Lords in Powdrill and Atkinson v Watson and another; Talbot and another v Cadge and another; and Talbot and another v Grundy and another.

• expand

  Talon Engineering Ltd v Smith [2018] IRLR 1104 EAT (1 report relating to this case)

  • Unfair dismissal: Refusal to postpone disciplinary hearing when chosen companion unavailable

    Date:

    15 August 2018

    In Talon Engineering Ltd v Smith, the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) held that an employer's refusal to postpone a disciplinary hearing for two weeks to allow the employee's union official to accompany her made her dismissal unfair.

• expand

  Tamana v Fyshe Horton Finney (in administration) ET/1800688/2013 (1 report relating to this case)

  • Whistleblowing: tribunal award of over £100,000 for CEO who resigned after being suspended for raising FSA concerns

    Date:

    10 October 2013

    The employment tribunal in this case awarded over £100,000 to a company CEO who raised concerns with the Financial Services Authority (FSA) over the company's relationship with a firm in the United Arab Emirates.

• expand

  Tameside Hospital NHS Foundation Trust v Mylott EAT/0352/09 & EAT/0399/10 (1 report relating to this case)

  • Case of the week: Disability discrimination

    Date:

    25 May 2011

    This week's case of the week, provided by DLA Piper, covers disability discrimination.