-
expand
UBAF Bank Ltd v Davis [1978] IRLR 442 EAT
(1 report relating to this case)
-
expand
Uber BV and others v Aslam and others [2018] IRLR 97 EAT
(2 reports relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 27 February 2018
In Uber BV and others v Aslam and others [2018] IRLR 97 EAT, the EAT held that Uber drivers are "workers" for the purposes of statutory employment rights.
-
- Date:
- 10 November 2017
The Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) has held that Uber drivers are workers rather than self-employed and are entitled to receive the national minimum wage and paid annual leave.
-
expand
Uber BV and others v Aslam and others [2019] IRLR 257 CA
(1 report relating to this case)
-
expand
Uber BV and others v Aslam and others [2021] UKSC 5 SC
(1 report relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 19 February 2021
In Uber BV and others v Aslam and others, the Supreme Court, agreeing with the employment tribunal and lower appeal courts, ruled that Uber drivers are workers and are entitled to receive the national minimum wage and paid annual leave.
-
expand
UCATT v Wates Group Ltd and another ET/1317908/2010
(1 report relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 8 March 2012
The cases below examine various issues arising under the Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 2006 (TUPE), including service provision changes; collective consultation; an employee's objection to the transfer and a substantial; and detrimental change to working conditions.
-
expand
Uchendu v International Marketing Group (UK) Inc and others EAT
(1 report relating to this case)
-
expand
Uddin v Direct Response Security Systems Ltd and another ET/1311988/10
(1 report relating to this case)
-
expand
Uddin v London Borough of Ealing [2020] IRLR 332 EAT
(1 report relating to this case)
-
expand
UK Coal Mining Ltd v National Union of Mineworkers (Northumberland Area) and another [2008] IRLR 4 EAT
(3 reports relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 24 November 2007
In UK Coal Mining Ltd v (1) National Union of Mineworkers (Northumberland Area) (2) The British Association of Colliery Management EAT/0397/06 & EAT/0141/07, the EAT held that the duty to consult about ways of "avoiding" redundancies inevitably involves consultation about the reasons behind the proposed dismissals and, contrary to previous authority, is not limited to consultation about how the redundancies are to be effected.
-
- Date:
- 8 November 2007
In UK Coal Mining Ltd v (1) National Union of Mineworkers (Northumberland Area) (2) The British Association of Colliery Management EAT/0397/06 & EAT/0141/07, the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) has held that an employer was obliged to consult with appropriate representatives about the reasons for the closure of the workplace, which was the reason for the redundancies.
-
- Date:
- 6 November 2007
This week's case of the week, provided by DLA Piper, covers consultation on collective redundancies.
-
expand
UK Waste Control Ltd v Wren [1995] ICR 974 EAT
(1 report relating to this case)