-
expand
Williams v Trustees of Swansea University Pension and Assurance Scheme and another [2019] IRLR 306 SC
(1 report relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 18 December 2018
In Williams v Trustees of Swansea University Pension & Assurance Scheme and another, the Supreme Court held that an employee, whose working hours had been reduced to accommodate his disability, was not treated "unfavourably" when his enhanced pension on ill-health retirement was based on his final part-time salary, rather than his full-time salary.
-
expand
Williams v Watsons Luxury Coaches Ltd [1990] IRLR 164 EAT
(1 report relating to this case)
-
expand
Williams v Ystrad Mynach College ET/1600019/11
(1 report relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 19 April 2012
This case is a useful early example, along with McGraw v London Ambulance Service NHS Trust ET/3301865/11, of how employment tribunals are approaching the new concept of "discrimination arising from disability" under the Equality Act 2010. This claimant succeeded in showing that his employer's requirement that he move to a new contract was unfavourable treatment that arose in consequence of his disability and the employer's actions were not justified.
-
expand
Williams-Drabble v Pathway Care Solutions Ltd [2005] ET/2601718/04
(2 reports relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 1 May 2005
Karen Smith and Sophy Robinson of Addleshaw Goddard bring you a comprehensive update on the latest decisions that could affect your organisation, and provide advice on what to do about them.
-
- Date:
- 22 March 2005
This week's case round-up from Eversheds, covering Sunday working amounting to religious discrimination.
-
expand
Williams-Ryan v Marks & Spencer plc [2004] All ER (D) 73 (Sep) EAT
(1 report relating to this case)
-
expand
Willow Oak Developments Ltd t/a Windsor Recruitment v Silverwood and others [2006] IRLR 607 CA
(1 report relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 20 October 2006
In Willow Oak Developments Ltd t/a Windsor Recruitment v Silverwood and others [2006] IRLR 607 CA, the Court of Appeal holds that a refusal to sign post-employment restrictive covenants can amount to a potentially fair reason for dismissal. However, the tribunal was entitled to find that the way in which the employer had sought to impose the change was procedurally unfair.
-
expand
Wilson (HM Inspector of Taxes) v Clayton [2005] IRLR 108 CA
(1 report relating to this case)
-
expand
Wilson and others v St Helens Borough Council [1996] IRLR 320 EAT
(1 report relating to this case)
-
expand
Wilson and others v St Helens Borough Council; British Fuels Ltd v Baxendale and Meade [1998] IRLR 706 HL
(1 report relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 15 November 1998
Employees who are dismissed by the transferor of an undertaking, and then re-engaged by the transferee on different but agreed terms, are not entitled to retain the benefit of their previous terms of employment, holds the House of Lords in Wilson and others v St Helens Borough Council and Baxendale and Meade v British Fuels Ltd.
-
expand
Wilson and others v St Helens Borough Council; Meade and Baxendale v British Fuels Ltd [1997] IRLR 505 CA
(1 report relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 15 August 1997
In (1) Wilson and others v St Helens Borough Council (2) Meade and another v British Fuels Ltd, the Court of Appeal considers the position under the Transfer of Undertakings Regulations where employees' contracts of employment are terminated on a relevant transfer and they accept employment with the transferee on less favourable terms and conditions.