-
expand
West v Yorkshire Ambulance Service NHS Trust ET/1801740/2015
(1 report relating to this case)
-
expand
Western Excavating (ECC) Ltd v Sharp [1978] IRLR 27 CA
(1 report relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 25 January 1978
In Western Excavating (ECC) Ltd v Sharp, the Court of Appeal lays down the rule that in order to be able to resign and claim constructive dismissal within the meaning of para. 5(2)(c) of Schedule 1 to the Trade Union and Labour Relations Act, an employee must be able to show that the employer's conduct amounted to a significant breach of a fundamental term of the contract of employment or indicated that the employer no longer intended to be bound by the contract.
-
expand
Westlake v ZSL London Zoo ET/2201118/2015
(1 report relating to this case)
-
expand
Wetstein v (1) Misprestige Management Services Ltd (2) O'Farrell EAT/523/91
(1 report relating to this case)
-
expand
Wheeldon v Marstons plc ET/1313364/2012
(1 report relating to this case)
-
expand
Wheeler v Durham County Council [2001] All ER (D) 380 (May) CA
(1 report relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 1 November 2001
The Court of Appeal gives important guidance on how far tribunals need to go in exploring the circumstances of a claim. Plus cases on protected disclosure, redundancy selection, discrimination by an agent, working time exemptions and constructive dismissal.
-
expand
Whelan v London Underground Ltd ET/3303109/09
(1 report relating to this case)
-
expand
Whitbread Beer Company v Williams and others EAT/160/94
(1 report relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 1 November 1995
An employer's decision to dismiss three employees who became drunk, abusive and violent after a seminar aimed at improving their "behavioural skills" was manifestly reasonable, holds the EAT in Whitbread Beer Company v Williams and others.
-
expand
Whitbread plc (t/a Whitbread Medway Inns) v Hall [2001] IRLR 275 CA
(1 report relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 15 April 2001
In a case where misconduct is admitted by the employee, the requirement of reasonableness in s.98(4) of the Employment Rights Act 1996 relates not only to the outcome in terms of the penalty imposed by the employer, but also to the process by which the employer arrived at that decision, holds the Court of Appeal in Whitbread plc (trading as Whitbread Medway Inns) v Hall.
-
expand
White v Propharma Group MIS Ltd ET/3303340/2015
(1 report relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 16 January 2017
This employment tribunal held, in White v Propharma Group MIS Ltd, that the employer had not indirectly discriminated against a female employee by requiring her to remove potential interruptions while working at home by arranging childcare.