-
expand
X County Council and another v D and another EAT/0155/12
(1 report relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 1 December 2012
Georgina Kyriacou and David Malamentenios are partners and Melissa Powys-Rogrigues, Sandra Martins, Colin Makin and Krishna Santra are associates at Colman Coyle Solicitors. They round up the latest rulings.
-
expand
X v Commission of the European Communities [1995] IRLR 320 ECJ
(1 report relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 1 June 1995
In X v Commission of the European Communities [1995] IRLR 320 ECJ, the European Court of Justice held that, under the European Convention on Human Rights an individual has the right to refuse to undergo a medical examination, and that this right must be respected.
-
expand
X v Mid Sussex Citizens Advice Bureau and another [2010] IRLR 101 EAT
(1 report relating to this case)
-
expand
X v Mid Sussex Citizens Advice Bureau and another [2013] IRLR 146 SC
(2 reports relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 30 March 2013
In X v Mid Sussex Citizens' Advice Bureau and another [2013] IRLR 146 SC, the Supreme Court held that the Equal Treatment Framework Directive does not encompass volunteers within the scope of "occupation". Accordingly, a volunteer who was not engaged under a worker's contract was not protected by the domestic legislation.
-
- Date:
- 18 December 2012
The Supreme Court has upheld the Court of Appeal decision that an unpaid volunteer with no contract was not protected by the (now repealed) Disability Discrimination Act 1995 and that the Equal Treatment Framework Directive (2000/78/EC) does not cover voluntary activity.
-
expand
X v Mid Sussex Citizens Advice Bureau and others [2011] EWCA Civ 28 CA
(2 reports relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 27 June 2011
In X v Mid Sussex Citizens’ Advice Bureau and others [2011] EWCA Civ 28 CA, the Court of Appeal held that a volunteer at a Citizens’ Advice Bureau was not an employee for the purposes of the Disability Discrimination Act 1995 and could not therefore claim disability discrimination when she was asked to stop her voluntary work.
-
- Date:
- 2 February 2011
The Court of Appeal has held that an unpaid voluntary worker was not protected by the Disability Discrimination Act 1995 and the Equal Treatment Framework Directive does not extend to volunteers.
-
expand
X v Stevens [2003] IRLR 411 EAT
(1 report relating to this case)
-
expand
X v The Governing Body of a School [2015] UKUT 7 (AAC)
(1 report relating to this case)
-
expand
X v Y [1999] ET/1805409/98
(1 report relating to this case)
-
expand
X v Y [2003] IRLR 561 EAT
(2 reports relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 1 November 2003
In X v Y, the EAT holds that an employment tribunal was right to find that an employee who worked with young offenders was fairly dismissed after being cautioned for an act of gross indecency with another man in a public toilet and failing to disclose this to his employer.
-
- Date:
- 1 July 2003
This week's case round-up by Eversheds, covering: dismissal for gross misconduct; and reasonable time off work for public duties.
-
expand
X v Y [2004] IRLR 625 CA
(3 reports relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 26 April 2005
Employers can win claims of breaches in human rights if they show they took justified and proportionate steps.
-
- Date:
- 1 August 2004
In X v Y [2004] IRLR 625 CA, the Court of Appeal held that the applicant had been fairly dismissed from his job working with youth offenders after he had been cautioned for gross indecency with another man in a public toilet and failed to disclose the fact that he had committed a criminal offence to his employers.
-
- Date:
- 22 June 2004
This week's case round-up from Eversheds, looking at: costs orders for unreasonable behaviour; and gross misconduct dismissals.