This is a preview. To continue reading, register for free access now. Register now or Log in

Collective redundancy consultation: no need for 20 or more redundancies to be "at one establishment"

  • expand disabled

    Usdaw v Ethel Austin Ltd (in administration); Usdaw and another v Unite the Union and others [2013] IRLR 686 EAT (0 other reports)

Usdaw v Ethel Austin Ltd (in administration); Usdaw and another v Unite the Union and others [2013] IRLR 686 EAT

redundancy | collective consultation | at one establishment

The Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) has held that the words "at one establishment" should be deleted from s.188 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992.