Compromise agreements: Compromise agreement with chief executive was not ultra vires
This report relates to 1 case(s)
Gibb v Maidstone & Tunbridge Wells NHS Trust  IRLR 786 CA (1 other report)
In Gibb v Maidstone & Tunbridge Wells NHS Trust  IRLR 786 CA, the Court of Appeal held that a compromise agreement entered into by an NHS trust and its chief executive was not so irrationally generous as to be ultra vires, as subsequently argued by the trust.
- A compromise agreement under which the chief executive of an NHS trust would receive a payment of £75,000 in lieu of notice and compensation of £175,000 was not "irrationally generous" and ultra vires, as argued by the trust.