This is a preview. To continue reading please log in or Register to read this article

Dispute resolution: COT3 agreement did not preclude victimisation arising from later events

This report relates to 1 case(s)

In McLean v TLC Marketing plc and others EAT/0429/08 & EAT/0430/08, the EAT held that, although a COT3 agreement could potentially preclude claims arising out of events occurring after its conclusion, very clear words would be required to achieve this result.