EAT considers if belief in right of creative ownership is a philosophical belief
This report relates to 1 case(s)
Gray v Mulberry Company (Design) Ltd  IRLR 893 EAT (0 other reports)
Gray v Mulberry Company (Design) Ltd  IRLR 893 EAT
religion or belief discrimination | manifestation of philosophical belief | copyright law
In Gray v Mulberry Company (Design) Ltd, the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) held that a tribunal had been entitled to conclude, on the particular facts, that a belief in the importance of copyright ownership lacked sufficient cogency to qualify as a philosophical belief under the Equality Act 2010.