This is a preview. To continue reading, register for free access now. Register now or Log in

First Hampshire & Dorset Ltd v Feist and others

This report relates to 1 case(s)

  • expand disabled

    First Hampshire & Dorset Ltd v Feist and others EAT/0510/06 (0 other reports)

working time | mobile workers | adequate rest

In First Hampshire & Dorset Ltd v Feist and others EAT/0510/06 , the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) has held that bus drivers are not entitled to a rigid 11 hours' rest in each 24-hour period, but instead should be given regular but undefined rest periods so as to prevent them injuring themselves or others through fatigue.