First Hampshire & Dorset Ltd v Feist and others
This report relates to 1 case(s)
-
expand disabled
First Hampshire & Dorset Ltd v Feist and others EAT/0510/06 (0 other reports)
working time | mobile workers | adequate rest
In First Hampshire & Dorset Ltd v Feist and others EAT/0510/06 , the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) has held that bus drivers are not entitled to a rigid 11 hours' rest in each 24-hour period, but instead should be given regular but undefined rest periods so as to prevent them injuring themselves or others through fatigue.
View the full article today
Register to read this article
Already an XpertHR user?
Log in
