This is a preview. To continue reading, register for free access now. Register now or Log in

Harassment "in the course of employment"

  • expand disabled

    Brannen v Frigoscandia (Grimsby) Ltd and Chisnall [1994] IT/34229/93 (0 other reports)

  • expand disabled

    Cumberbatch v Hickson and Department of Social Security [1994] IT/3221/94 (0 other reports)

  • expand disabled

    Harding v Dale Joinery Ltd [1994] IT/17827/92 (0 other reports)

Racial and sexual harassment can pose questions of whether the employer should be held legally liable, as Harding v Dale Joinery Ltd1 Brannen v Frigoscandia (Grimsby) Ltd and Chisnall2 Cumberbatch v Hickson and Department of Social Security3 illustrate. Although the discrimination statutes impose a strict test of liability, an employer is only vicariously liable for acts done by employees in the course of their employment.