This is a preview. To continue reading, register for free access now. Register now or Log in

Indirect discrimination: no need for claimants to explain why they are disadvantaged

  • expand disabled

    Essop and others v Home Office (UK Border Agency) [2017] IRLR 558 SC (0 other reports)

Essop and others v Home Office (UK Border Agency) [2017] IRLR 558 SC

indirect discrimination | adverse impact | particular disadvantage

The Supreme Court has held that claimants in indirect discrimination claims are not required to explain why the provision, criterion or practice (PCP) puts, or would put, the affected group at a particular disadvantage.