Part-timers, equal pay and pensions
This report relates to 2 case(s)
-
expand
Allonby v Accrington & Rossendale College and others [2004] IRLR 224 ECJ
(7 other reports)
-
- Date:
- 1 March 2005
In our latest round-up of cases from the European Court of Justice, we look at cases on equal pay, maternity leave and equal treatment, the variation of terms relating to early retirement following a transfer of an undertaking, working time and European Works Councils.
-
- Date:
- 1 March 2004
The European Court of Justice (ECJ) has published its ruling in Allonby v Accrington & Rossendale College.
-
- Date:
- 1 March 2004
In Allonby v Accrington & Rossendale College and others [2004] IRLR 224 ECJ, the European Court of Justice held that a female lecturer employed via an agency could not claim equal pay in relation to a male lecturer employed directly by the college. The employment agency and the college could not be construed as being the same employer, and the differences in equal pay could not be attributed to a single source, so there was no single body responsible for the inequality.
-
- Date:
- 1 March 2004
In Allonby v Accrington & Rossendale College and others, the European Court of Justice (ECJ) rules that a lecturer employed through an agency could not claim equal pay with lecturers employed directly by the college, but she could claim entitlement to join the lecturers' statutory pension scheme even though it was open only to those with a contract of employment.
-
- Date:
- 6 February 2004
The ECJ has delivered its decision in the case of Allonby.
-
- Date:
- 3 February 2004
This week's case round-up from Eversheds, covering: the identity of the employer in a tribunal claim; and equal pay for an agency worker.
-
- Date:
- 1 February 2004
Our resident experts at Pinsents bring you a comprehensive update on all the latest decisions that could affect your organisation, and advice on what to do about them.
-
expand
Preston and others v Wolverhampton Healthcare NHS Trust and others (No.3) [2004] IRLR 96 EAT
(2 other reports)
-
- Date:
- 1 February 2004
A new ruling in the long-running Preston case allows part-time employees, whose employment has been transferred, much longer to bring claims of indirect sex discrimination if they were refused entry to an occupational scheme due to the hours they work.
-
- Date:
- 1 February 2004
Our resident experts at Pinsents bring you a comprehensive update on all the latest decisions that could affect your organisation, and advice on what to do about them.
There have been two recent decisions on part
timers' access to pension schemes under equal pay legislation; one from the
European Court (ECJ) and another from the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT).
View the full article today
Register to read this article
Already an XpertHR user?
Log in