Public disgrace could justify dismissal

This report relates to 1 case(s)

• expand

  Post Office v Liddiard [2001] All ER (D) 46 (Jun) CA (3 other reports)

  • Courts of Appeal conflict over definition of detriment

    Date:

    1 October 2001

    Two apparently contradictory judgements address whether treatment must have any material consequences to constitute a detriment under discrimination law. Plus, cases on Tupe, termination payments and unfair dismissal for misconduct unrelated to employment

  • Case roundup: TUPE transfers and unfair dismissal

    Date:

    21 August 2001

    This week's case roundup, covering failure to inform and consult on a TUPE transfer and dismissal as a result of bringing an employer into disrepute.

  • Unfair dismissal: Tribunal wrongly held convicted football hooligan's dismissal to be unfair

    Date:

    1 August 2001

    In Post Office v Liddiard, the Court of Appeal sets aside an employment tribunal's decision that the dismissal of an employee following his involvement in football hooliganism was unfair.