All items: Time limits

• expand

  (1) Okoro (2) Okenwa v (1) Taylor Woodrow Construction Ltd (2) Coyle Personnel plc (3) Mane Contract Services Ltd [2012] EWCA Civ 1590 CA (1 report relating to this case)

  • Case round-up

    Date:

    1 March 2013

    David Malamatenios is a partner and Colin Makin, Sandra Martins, Melissa Powys- Rodrigues and Linda Quinn are associates at Colman Coyle Solicitors. They round up the latest rulings.

• expand

  Adekeye v The Post Office (No.2) [1997] IRLR 105 CA (2 reports relating to this case)

  • Race discrimination: No remedy for discrimination against ex-employee

    Date:

    1 March 1997

    In Adekeye v The Post Office (No. 2), the Court of Appeal holds that an employee who was summarily dismissed is not entitled to claim under the Race Relations Act in respect of alleged discrimination in her internal appeal against dismissal.

  • No remedy for discrimination against ex-employee

    Date:

    1 January 1997

    In Adekeye v The Post Office (No.2) (13 November 1996) EOR71B, the Court of Appeal rules that the Race Relations Act 1976 does not cover discrimination against those who are no longer employed at the time of the act complained of.

• expand

  Adekeye v The Post Office [1993] IRLR 324 EAT (1 report relating to this case)

  • Appeal decision grounds for complaint

    Date:

    1 July 1993

    In Adekeye v The Post Office (10 March 1993) EOR50C, the EAT holds that the outcome of an appeal against dismissal can constitute a freestanding ground for a complaint of race discrimination.

• expand

  Akhter v Family Services Unit [1996] EAT/1285/95 (1 report relating to this case)

  • Repeated refusal separate act

    Date:

    1 December 1996

    Each refusal of an employee's request to use a contractual grievance procedure could be regarded as a separate act for time limit purposes where a different person took the decision, the EAT has ruled in Akhter v Family Services Unit.

• expand

  Ali v Office of National Statistics [2005] IRLR 201 CA (1 report relating to this case)

  • Points of procedure

    Date:

    10 June 2005

    A review of recent significant cases on practice and procedure in the employment tribunals, EAT and Court of Appeal.

• expand

  Aniagwu v London Borough of Hackney and Owens [1999] IRLR 303 EAT (1 report relating to this case)

  • Grievance procedure grounds for delay

    Date:

    1 November 1998

    In Aniagwu v London Borough of Hackney and Owens (2 September 1998) EOR82E, the EAT holds that it was just and equitable to extend time for bringing a race discrimination complaint where the delay in presenting the claim was caused by the applicant using the employer's internal grievance procedure.

• expand

  Apelogun-Gabriels v London Borough of Lambeth and another [2002] IRLR 116 CA (2 reports relating to this case)

  • Procedure: No extension of time while grievance procedure is being used

    Date:

    15 May 2002

    The Court of Appeal in Apelogun-Gabriels v London Borough of Lambeth holds that there is no general principle that it will be just and equitable to extend time for bringing a tribunal claim where the applicant is using the employer's internal grievance procedure.

  • Case digest

    Date:

    1 April 2002

    Hilary Slater, consultant with Cobbetts solicitors, provides a round-up of decisions on discrimination.

• expand

  Arnold v Barnfield College EAT (1 report relating to this case)

  • Points of procedure

    Date:

    5 August 2002

    A round-up of recent noteworthy decisions on practice and procedure in the employment tribunals and the EAT.

• expand

  Arube v Devon Probation Service [2000] EAT (1 report relating to this case)

  • Time limits: No continuing act of discrimination but tribunal should have extended time

    Date:

    15 February 2001

    An applicant subjected to three separate acts of unintentional racial discrimination, carried out by different people at different times, could not successfully argue that there was a continuing act of racial discrimination for the purposes of s.68(7) of the Race Relations Act 1976 ("the RRA"), holds the EAT in Arube v Devon Probation Service.

• expand

  Aziz v First Division Association (FDA) [2010] EWCA Civ 304 CA (2 reports relating to this case)

  • Case round-up

    Date:

    1 May 2010

    Richard Ryan, associate, Helen Ward, associate, and Tori O'Neil, trainee solicitor, Addleshaw Goddard, detail the latest rulings.

  • Aziz v First Division Association (FDA)

    Date:

    1 April 2010

    The Court of Appeal has held that, where a claimant is alleging that separate incidents form one continuous act for the purposes of extending the normal time limit within which to bring a claim for racial discrimination, a relevant but not conclusive factor is whether the same individuals or different individuals were involved in the separate incidents.