Reduction in headcount not necessary for redundancy
This report relates to 1 case(s)
-
expand
Packman t/a Packman Lucas Associates v Fauchon [2012] IRLR 721 EAT (1 other report)
redundancy | dismissal | diminution in work
The Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) has affirmed the employment tribunal's decision that an employee, who was dismissed because of the employer's downturn in work and consequent reduction in the hours to be worked, was dismissed by reason of redundancy, even though there was no reduction in the employees required.
To continue reading, register for free access now.
Register now
Already an XpertHR user?
Log in
