Sex discrimination: Suit requirement not discriminatory
This report relates to 1 case(s)
-
expand disabled
James v Bank of England EAT/226/94 (0 other reports)
An employer's dress code which required men to wear a suit, but gave women a much wider choice of clothing, did not give rise to any sex discrimination against men. This finding by an industrial tribunal disclosed no error of law, holds the EAT in James v Bank of England.
View the full article today
Register to read this article
Already an XpertHR user?
Log in
