All items: Harassment

• expand

  (1) D & H Travel Ltd and (2) Henderson v Foster EAT/0226/06 (1 report relating to this case)

  • Points of procedure round-up

    Date:

    16 February 2007

    A review of recent significant cases on practice and procedure in the EAT and the Court of Appeal.

• expand

  (1) Munchkins Restaurant Ltd (2) Moss v Karmazyn and others EAT/0359/09 (1 report relating to this case)

  • Case round-up

    Date:

    1 August 2010

    Ceri Hughes, David Parry, and Carly Mather, associates at Addleshaw Goddard, detail the latest rulings.

• expand

  (1) Reed and (2) Bull Information Systems Ltd v Stedman [1999] IRLR 299 EAT (2 reports relating to this case)

  • Subjective test for harassment

    Date:

    1 July 1999

    In Reed and Bull Information Systems Ltd v Stedman (11 February 1999) EOR86B, the EAT provides general guidance on the correct approach to sexual harassment cases.

  • Sex discrimination: How tribunals should approach sexual harassment complaints

    Date:

    1 May 1999

    In Reed and another v Stedman, the EAT gives employment tribunals general guidance as to how they should approach complaints of sexual harassment at work. According to the EAT, sexual harassment is essentially words or conduct of a sexual nature which are unwelcome to the recipient.

• expand

  A v (1) B (2) C [2002] ET/3104054/01 (1 report relating to this case)

  • Case digest

    Date:

    1 February 2003

    Hilary Slater, consultant with Cobbetts solicitors, provides a round-up of employment tribunal decisions on discrimination.

• expand

  A v (1) C & T Townsend t/a Ultimate Sports (2) C [2006] ET/3201244/04 (1 report relating to this case)

  • Case digest: sexual harassment

    Date:

    1 February 2007

    Tina McKevitt, lecturer in employment law at University of Sheffield, provides a round-up of employment tribunal decisions on discrimination.

• expand

  A v (1) R1 Ltd (in liquidation) (2) R2 Ltd [2002] ET/3301111/01 (1 report relating to this case)

  • Case digest

    Date:

    1 February 2003

    Hilary Slater, consultant with Cobbetts solicitors, provides a round-up of employment tribunal decisions on discrimination.

• expand

  A v B [1999] ET/2600463/98 (1 report relating to this case)

  • £23,000 for injury to feelings

    Date:

    1 June 1999

    In A v B a Lincoln employment tribunal (Chair: J Walker) awards compensation of£36,290 (plus interest), including £23,000 for injury to feelings, to a young woman subjected to sexual harassment.

• expand

  A v B [2000] ET/2501522/99 (1 report relating to this case)

  • Injury to feelings heightened by childhood abuse

    Date:

    1 December 2000

    In A v B a Newcastle upon Tyne employment tribunal (Chair: P G Rennie) holds that a woman who was subjected to a four-month campaign of sexual harassment by her employer was unlawfully discriminated against on grounds of sex, and awards compensation of £18,500, including £12,000 for injury to feelings which were heightened by the sexual abuse that she had experienced as a child.

• expand

  A v B Ltd and others [1997] IT/2600329/97 (1 report relating to this case)

  • Notice not enough to avoid liability

    Date:

    1 September 1998

    In A v B Ltd and others a Nottingham industrial tribunal (Chair: D R Sneath) holds that an employer which simply put up a notice to the effect that sexual harassment was unacceptable and did nothing more, had no defence to a claim that it was vicariously liable for the sexual assault of a female employee by male employees.

• expand

  A v Civil Aviation Authority [1995] IT/25987/94 (1 report relating to this case)

  • Harassment policy must be implemented

    Date:

    1 March 1996

    In order to avoid liability under s. 41(3) of the Sex Discrimination Act 1975, a large employer must ensure that an adequate policy is "understood, implemented and observed throughout the workplace", a Brighton industrial tribunal (Chair: S J W Scott) has ruled in A v Civil Aviation Authority.