All items: Service provision changes

• expand

  Amaryllis Ltd (formerly of Montrose Road Chelmsford Essex) v McLeod and others EAT/0273/15 (1 report relating to this case)

  • Case round-up

    Date:

    1 September 2016

    Chris Cook is partner and head of employment and Keely Rushmore is senior associate at SA Law. They round up the latest rulings.

• expand

  Arch Initiatives v Greater Manchester West Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust and others [2016] IRLR 406 EAT (1 report relating to this case)

  • TUPE case confirms obligations apply to multiple providers

    Date:

    15 June 2016

    TUPE transferee obligations can apply where a service changing hands is divided among multiple providers on functional lines, explains Dr John McMullen in his latest update.

• expand

  Argyll Coastal Services Ltd v Stirling and others EATS/0012/11 (1 report relating to this case)

  Decisions coming to a similar conclusion were given by the EAT around the same time in Seawell Ltd v Ceva Freight (UK) Ltd and another and Eddie Stobart Ltd v Moreman and others [2012] IRLR 356 EAT.

  • Case of the week: EAT provides guidance on "organised grouping of employees" on service provision change

    Date:

    1 June 2012

    This week's case of the week, provided by DLA Piper, covers what constitutes an "organised grouping of employees" on a service provision change for TUPE purposes.

• expand

  Barlow v Allen t/a Associated Cleaning Services ET/2407598/09 (1 report relating to this case)

  • Loss of cleaning contract did not result in TUPE transfer

    Date:

    4 May 2010

    This case is a useful example of a tribunal's approach to whether or not there has been a TUPE transfer on a service provision change.

• expand

  BT Managed Services Ltd v Edwards and another [2015] IRLR 994 EAT (2 reports relating to this case)

  • TUPE: Employee on indefinite sick leave not "assigned" to organised grouping of employees

    Date:

    30 March 2016

    In BT Managed Services Ltd v Edwards and another [2015] IRLR 994 EAT, the EAT held that an employee on permanent sick leave who had remained on the employer's books was not "assigned" to the organised grouping that transferred under TUPE on a service provision change.

  • TUPE transfers: employee on indefinite sick leave not transferred

    Date:

    10 September 2015

    An Employment Appeal Tribunal has held that an employee, not working in his employer's business because of health problems, but retained as an employee to receive permanent health insurance (PHI) payments, was not "assigned" to the organised grouping of employees for the purposes of a TUPE transfer.

• expand

  Ceva Freight (UK) Ltd v Seawell Ltd [2013] CSIH 59 CS (1 report relating to this case)

  • Case of the week: Court of Session provides guidance on TUPE service provision changes

    Date:

    11 September 2013

    In DLA Piper's case of the week, Ceva Freight (UK) Ltd v Seawell Ltd, the Court of Session provided guidance on what constitutes an "organised grouping of employees" on a service provision change for TUPE purposes.

• expand

  Clearsprings Management Ltd v Ankers and others EAT/0054/08 (1 report relating to this case)

  • Case of the week: TUPE and supplier contracts

    Date:

    21 April 2009

    This week's case of the week, provided by DLA Piper, covers TUPE and supplier contracts.

• expand

  Costain Ltd v Armitage and another EAT/0048/14 (1 report relating to this case)

  • TUPE service provision change: tribunal's reasoning flawed on assigning manager to organised grouping of employees

    Date:

    29 October 2014

    In DLA Piper's latest case report, the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) found that an employment tribunal's judgment was flawed when it held that an employee of a transferor was assigned to the organised group of employees that were reassigned to the transferee on a service provision change.

• expand

  CT Plus (Yorkshire) CIC v Black and others EAT/0035/16 (1 report relating to this case)

  • Case round-up

    Date:

    1 November 2016

    Chris Cook is partner and head of employment and Keely Rushmore is senior associate at SA Law. They round up the latest rulings.

• expand

  Eddie Stobart Ltd v Moreman and others [2012] IRLR 356 EAT (1 report relating to this case)

  Decisions coming to a similar conclusion were given by the EAT around the same time in Seawell Ltd v Ceva Freight (UK) Ltd and another and Argyll Coastal Services Ltd v Stirling and others EATS/0012/11.

  • Case of the week: Service provision changes under TUPE

    Date:

    11 April 2012

    This week's case of the week, provided by DLA Piper, covers service provision changes under TUPE.