Victimisation protection again restrictively interpreted
This report relates to 1 case(s)
-
expand disabled
Cornelius v University College of Swansea [1987] IRLR 141 CA (0 other reports)
In Cornelius v University College of Swansea (10.2.87) EOR13D, the Court of Appeal holds that a complainant under s.4 of the Sex Discrimination Act 1975 (SDA) must not only show that she was victimised because she brought proceedings against her employer, but she must also show that the basis for the victimisation was that those proceedings were brought under the SDA.
View the full article today
Register to read this article
Already an XpertHR user?
Log in
