Whistleblowing victimisation: EAT rules on correct causation test
This report relates to 1 case(s)
-
expand
Fecitt and others v NHS Manchester [2011] IRLR 111 EAT (2 other reports)
whistleblowing | victimisation | test for causation
The Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) has held that, where an employee has made a protected disclosure and suffered a detriment, the employer must prove that the detriment was "in no sense whatsoever" on the ground of the protected disclosure.
View the full article today
Register to read this article
Already an XpertHR user?
Log in
