Working time: Threat to dismiss was unlawful detriment
-
expand disabled
Pazur v Lexington Catering Services Ltd EAT/0018/19 (0 other reports)
Pazur v Lexington Catering Services Ltd EAT/0018/19
working time | rest breaks | detriment
In Pazur v Lexington Catering Services Ltd, the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) held that a worker had been subjected to a detriment when he was threatened with dismissal after he refused to return to work following a breach of his right to a rest break.
To continue reading, register for free access now.
Register now
Already a Brightmine HR and Compliance Centre user?
Log in
