This is a preview. To continue reading please log in or Register to read this article

Working time: Threat to dismiss was unlawful detriment

This report relates to 1 case(s)

  • expand disabled

    Pazur v Lexington Catering Services Ltd EAT/0018/19 (0 other reports)

Pazur v Lexington Catering Services Ltd EAT/0018/19

working time | rest breaks | detriment

In Pazur v Lexington Catering Services Ltd, the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) held that a worker had been subjected to a detriment when he was threatened with dismissal after he refused to return to work following a breach of his right to a rest break.