-
- Type:
- Employment law manual
Updated to include information on University College London v Brown, in which the EAT considered the basis on which the employer's "sole or main purpose" is to be judged in an unlawful detriment claim.
-
- Date:
- 13 January 2021
- Type:
- Podcasts and webinars
We highlight key cases due to be decided this year and discuss their impact on HR. These include cases on: worker status, holiday pay, the national minimum wage and sleep-in care workers, trade unions and collective bargaining, and equal pay.
-
- Date:
- 17 June 2019
- Type:
- Law reports
In Kostal UK Ltd v Dunkley and others, the Court of Appeal held that the employer had not made unlawful inducements when it sent letters to employees asking them to agree a pay deal that had been rejected by their trade union.
-
- Date:
- 2 May 2018
- Type:
- Law reports
In Kostal UK Ltd v Dunkley and others [2018] IRLR 428 EAT, the EAT held that the employer made unlawful inducements when it sent letters to employees asking them to agree a pay deal that had been rejected by their trade union. The employer had sought the "prohibited result" that - for the following year at least - the employees' terms would no longer be determined by collective agreement, even though the employer had no intention of actually derecognising the union.
-
- Date:
- 11 January 2018
- Type:
- Law reports
In Kostal UK Ltd v Dunkley and others, the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) held that an employer offered unlawful inducements when it attempted to bypass collective bargaining with a trade union by making pay offers directly to its members.
-
- Date:
- 15 November 2017
- Type:
- Commentary and analysis
This article looks at the structure of nationally and locally negotiated conditions of service in local authorities.
-
- Type:
- Employment law manual
Updated to include information on Lidl Ltd v Central Arbitration Committee and another, in which the Court of Appeal considered the appropriate bargaining unit for statutory recognition.
-
- Type:
- Policies and documents
Updated to highlight the impact of the General Data Protection Regulation in force from 25 May 2018, on this document.
-
- Date:
- 7 May 2016
- Type:
- Law reports
In University of London v Morrissey, the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) found that the University of London breached the Information and Consultation of Employees Regulations 2004, when it asked two recognised trade unions, whose members constituted around 25% of the workforce, to nominate employee representatives.
-
- Date:
- 1 July 2015
- Type:
- Law reports
David Malamatenios is a partner, and Krishna Santra, Sandra Martins and Colin Makin are senior associates at Colman Coyle Solicitors. They round up the latest rulings.
