-
- Date:
- 24 August 2017
- Type:
- Law reports
The High Court has held that the suspension of a teacher was a "knee-jerk" reaction and in breach of the implied term of trust and confidence between the employer and employee.
-
- Date:
- 14 August 2017
- Type:
- Commentary and analysis
Outplacement used to be a service offered by employers to smooth the exit of key employees from the business. But now many organisations are using it in a more strategic way to ensure they develop the right talent and that employees emerge stronger from major changes.
-
- Date:
- 3 August 2017
- Type:
- News
A Court of Appeal decision "makes it much harder for employers to ignore staff when making major changes in the workplace", Unison claims.
-
- Date:
- 2 August 2017
- Type:
- Law reports
The Court of Appeal has held that the legislative provision that excludes park police constables from enjoying collective consultation rights is in breach of their, and their union's, art.11 rights under the European Convention on Human Rights.
-
- Date:
- 6 July 2017
- Type:
- Law reports
The Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) has held that, on the particular facts, the employee's dismissal for 20 months' unauthorised absence was unfair.
-
- Type:
- Employment law manual
Updated to include information on continuity of service for NHS employees in relation to statutory redundancy payments.
-
- Date:
- 1 July 2017
- Type:
- Law reports
Kirsti Laird is senior associate at Charles Russell Speechlys. She rounds up the latest rulings.
-
- Date:
- 30 June 2017
- Type:
- Audio and video
In this week's podcast, we offer practical advice on how to identify a fair selection pool during a redundancy process.
-
- Date:
- 30 June 2017
- Type:
- Law reports
The European Court of Justice has held that "pre-pack" administration, which is designed to facilitate the sale of a business as a going concern in the event of insolvency, may not prevent employees from having TUPE rights.
-
- Date:
- 29 June 2017
- Type:
- Law reports
The Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) has held that, in a conduct dismissal, an employer must establish that the reason or principal reason for the dismissal relates to conduct, and not that the conduct itself is culpable.
