Topics

Pregnancy and maternity discrimination

New and updated

  • Date:
    22 January 2010
    Type:
    Law reports

    Case of the week: Sex discrimination

    This week's case of the week, provided by DLA Piper, covers sex discrimination.

  • Date:
    19 January 2010
    Type:
    Law reports

    Pregnancy and maternity leave discrimination: employment tribunal decisions

    This article summarises the main issues and outcomes in five tribunal cases brought by pregnant employees or employees on maternity leave. Although the decisions are not binding on other tribunals, they provide useful illustrations for employers of situations that have led to pregnancy discrimination claims.

  • Date:
    12 January 2010
    Type:
    Law reports

    O'Neill v Buckinghamshire County Council

    The Employment Appeal Tribunal has upheld an employment tribunal finding that the employer had not failed to carry out a risk assessment on the basis that the requirement to carry out an assessment did not apply to the employee's work. There is no general obligation to carry out a risk assessment on pregnant employees so that a failure to do so amounts to discrimination per se. The obligation to carry out a risk assessment is triggered only in certain circumstances.

  • Date:
    11 June 2008
    Type:
    Law reports

    Sex discrimination: No obligation to communicate risk assessment findings in writing

    In Stevenson v JM Skinner & Co EAT/0584/07, the EAT held that an employer complied with its statutory duty to carry out a risk assessment in relation to a pregnant employee when it addressed her concerns at meetings with her and, taking account of all the circumstances, evaluated and agreed the relevant risks.

  • Date:
    28 May 2008
    Type:
    Law reports

    Pregnancy dismissal: Fertilised but non-implanted ova did not constitute pregnancy

    In Mayr v B├Ąckerei und Konditorei Gerhard Flockner OHG [2008] IRLR 387, the ECJ held that the protection afforded by the Pregnant Workers Directive against dismissal on grounds of pregnancy does not extend to a woman undergoing IVF treatment who was dismissed when in-vitro-fertilised ova existed but had not yet been transferred to her uterus. However, if she was dismissed essentially because she had undergone this advanced stage of IVF treatment, her dismissal would amount to direct sex discrimination contrary to the Equal Treatment Directive.

  • Date:
    17 April 2008
    Type:
    Law reports

    Stevenson v JM Skinner & Co EAT/0584/07

    The Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) has held that the requirement to assess the safety risks to a pregnant employee is met by recording the risks then passing on the findings of the assessment orally to the employee.

  • Date:
    18 March 2008
    Type:
    Law reports

    Case of the week: Pregnant workers

    This week's case of the week, provided by DLA Piper, covers pregnant workers.

  • Type:
    FAQs

    Where an employee who is about to go on maternity leave applies for an internal vacancy, must the employer consider them for the position?

  • Date:
    1 December 2007
    Type:
    Law reports

    Case digest: pregnancy discrimination

    Tina McKevitt, solicitor and lecturer in law, provides a round-up of employment tribunal decisions on disability discrimination.

  • Date:
    18 July 2007
    Type:
    Law reports

    Maternity leave: Right to return to work

    In Blundell v The Governing Body of St Andrew's Catholic Primary School and another EAT/0329/06 the Employment Appeal Tribunal held that a teacher returning to work following maternity leave was not entitled to return to the same class that she had been teaching when her maternity leave began.