Topics

Pregnancy and maternity discrimination

New and updated

  • Pregnancy risk assessments are triggered by potential for harm

    Date:
    1 March 2010
    Type:
    Law reports

    A recent appeal judgment clarifies when an employer should assess the risks for a pregnant worker, reports Howard Fidderman

  • Case round-up

    Date:
    1 February 2010
    Type:
    Law reports

    Susannah Jarvis (associate) and Kate Williams (professional support lawyer) at Addleshaw Goddard analyse important rulings.

  • Case of the week: Sex discrimination

    Date:
    22 January 2010
    Type:
    Law reports

    This week's case of the week, provided by DLA Piper, covers sex discrimination.

  • Pregnancy and maternity leave discrimination: employment tribunal decisions

    Date:
    19 January 2010
    Type:
    Law reports

    This article summarises the main issues and outcomes in five tribunal cases brought by pregnant employees or employees on maternity leave. Although the decisions are not binding on other tribunals, they provide useful illustrations for employers of situations that have led to pregnancy discrimination claims.

  • O'Neill v Buckinghamshire County Council

    Date:
    12 January 2010
    Type:
    Law reports

    The Employment Appeal Tribunal has upheld an employment tribunal finding that the employer had not failed to carry out a risk assessment on the basis that the requirement to carry out an assessment did not apply to the employee's work. There is no general obligation to carry out a risk assessment on pregnant employees so that a failure to do so amounts to discrimination per se. The obligation to carry out a risk assessment is triggered only in certain circumstances.

  • Sex discrimination: No obligation to communicate risk assessment findings in writing

    Date:
    11 June 2008
    Type:
    Law reports

    In Stevenson v JM Skinner & Co EAT/0584/07, the EAT held that an employer complied with its statutory duty to carry out a risk assessment in relation to a pregnant employee when it addressed her concerns at meetings with her and, taking account of all the circumstances, evaluated and agreed the relevant risks.

  • Pregnancy dismissal: Fertilised but non-implanted ova did not constitute pregnancy

    Date:
    28 May 2008
    Type:
    Law reports

    In Mayr v B├Ąckerei und Konditorei Gerhard Flockner OHG [2008] IRLR 387, the ECJ held that the protection afforded by the Pregnant Workers Directive against dismissal on grounds of pregnancy does not extend to a woman undergoing IVF treatment who was dismissed when in-vitro-fertilised ova existed but had not yet been transferred to her uterus. However, if she was dismissed essentially because she had undergone this advanced stage of IVF treatment, her dismissal would amount to direct sex discrimination contrary to the Equal Treatment Directive.

  • Stevenson v JM Skinner & Co EAT/0584/07

    Date:
    17 April 2008
    Type:
    Law reports

    The Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) has held that the requirement to assess the safety risks to a pregnant employee is met by recording the risks then passing on the findings of the assessment orally to the employee.

  • Case of the week: Pregnant workers

    Date:
    18 March 2008
    Type:
    Law reports

    This week's case of the week, provided by DLA Piper, covers pregnant workers.

  • Where a suitably qualified employee who is about to go on maternity leave wishes to apply for an internal vacancy, must they be considered for the position?

    Type:
    FAQs